Author | Thread |
|
02/05/2004 03:12:27 AM |
Critique Club
Well, not last at least. As an example of doing this kind of stuff it's pretty reasonable ... though not territory in which I have much expertise, so you aren't going to get a very thorough critique from me on that I fear.
Also, quite clearly, you suffered from the 'photographic integrity' thing that is rife around the site right now. Even though this is 'legal', there is certainly a reaction against the use of it - partly at least, out of fear that the 'real photography' component of the challenge is under threat. Maybe that will lessen as time goes on, but I wouldn't hold out a lot of hope.
It fits the challenge, though. and there is something oriental-seeming in that processing you've done.
Ed |
|
|
01/29/2004 07:39:25 PM |
You have done some good work in the past, it's a pitty about this shot. I really thought it was done by a real ammature, but obviously not! |
|
Comments Made During the Challenge  |
|
01/29/2004 06:41:38 PM |
I'm not really a fan of the inverted or oversaturated, funky edited pop art look, sorry. |
|
|
01/29/2004 04:44:35 PM |
Different and fits the challenge I think this would be nicer in the usual image as it looks like a nice dog Not too keen on this variation |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
01/29/2004 03:21:19 PM |
I never have and probably never will appreciate the psychedelic over processed shots such as this one...
TC |
|
|
01/28/2004 07:21:58 PM |
I like this as digital art. The pose and colors are great. The background needs to be cleaned up a bit and maybe fill in the nose. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
01/28/2004 05:31:37 PM |
I think the processing is overdone; the essence of the dog is lost in the extreme posterization. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
01/27/2004 12:45:37 PM |
this would be a nice addition to an art collection |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
01/27/2004 10:46:35 AM |
The effect really hurts the image here. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
01/27/2004 08:58:37 AM |
The affect is too distracting, it kind of hurts my eyes =/ |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
01/26/2004 03:27:27 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
01/26/2004 11:06:30 AM |
less photoshop, more photo....
i don't mean to sound harsh, but this just isn't a photograph anymore, and for whatever it is, it just isn't all that appealing. trust in the image... |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
01/26/2004 04:20:16 AM |
don't like thw washed out color |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
01/25/2004 09:14:06 PM |
I don't like the crop on this with so much of the light teal at the top and on the right upper corner, as well as forming the dog's nose and seemingly cutting off its paws, etc. I think I'd have liked it a lot in a tighter crop and/or with some hint of where the nose ends. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
01/25/2004 06:38:11 AM |
I really like the technique you used with this image. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
01/25/2004 05:33:08 AM |
This effect really isn't that pleasing I am afraid. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
01/25/2004 03:44:45 AM |
Trying to do something creative with a boring pet photo is a good intention, ..but photoshop (or any ) is difficult to master. Keep trying with a bit more subtility. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
01/24/2004 07:56:56 PM |
not sure what you were going for but the effect is way to distracting |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
01/24/2004 07:10:43 PM |
You should read the advanced editing rules. - 1 |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/07/2025 01:06:34 PM EDT.