Author | Thread |
Comments Made During the Challenge  |
|
01/16/2005 04:44:31 PM |
it's a bokeh of roses >_<
unfortunately this doesn't seem to meet the challenge, other than in this tangential punny way. the background is completely flat and adds nothing to the image. |
|
|
01/15/2005 06:10:20 PM |
|
|
01/11/2005 06:14:48 AM |
A nice bouquet, but no bokeh. Some out-of-focus highlights in the background would have helped I think. 7 |
|
|
01/11/2005 05:28:32 AM |
Excellent picture but no bokeh ! |
|
|
01/10/2005 10:14:41 PM |
there is no bokeh here, just a uniform background |
|
|
01/10/2005 05:41:42 PM |
I don't know that this really qualifies for "bokeh", but it's a gorgeous image! |
|
|
01/10/2005 12:53:03 PM |
While the backround color works well with your foreground subject I don't see enough bokah to inhance your image as I interpret this challenge. |
|
|
01/10/2005 08:49:11 AM |
There is absolutely 100% no bokeh in this picture! Nice shot, but not apropriate. If you had capture these flowers in a garden with out of focus shapes in the background to enhance your subject, it could have worked. |
|
|
01/10/2005 08:07:07 AM |
Don't see the boken? Could be me though.... |
|
|
01/10/2005 05:11:48 AM |
The short definition of Bokeh from KenRockwell.com, which I am using for voting on this challenge: "Bokeh describes the rendition of out-of-focus points of light." To me this image does not show bokeh well at all. Is the subject enhanced by the bokeh of the background? Based on the previous statement, no. Lovely roses though. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/09/2025 07:39:08 PM EDT.