| Author | Thread |
|
|
06/15/2003 02:10:53 AM · #1 |
I posted This photo on photosig. Personally I think the girl ads interest to the picture. But some suggest that the picture would be better without her. Please tell me what you think.
|
|
|
|
06/15/2003 02:46:49 AM · #2 |
Definitely WITH THE GIRL - adds foreground interest.
|
|
|
|
06/15/2003 02:56:46 AM · #3 |
I agree with Galina. That girl adds to this image. As an architectural image, it is very good. But, as a strong glamour image, it is even better.
|
|
|
|
06/15/2003 03:11:38 AM · #4 |
Yep, the girl definitely improves the image! :)
Nice shot too (BTW)
|
|
|
|
06/15/2003 03:14:00 AM · #5 |
Thanx people.
I was beginning to doubt myself...
|
|
|
|
06/15/2003 03:36:29 AM · #6 |
Btw. The photo was a crop of this one:
His model my photo
|
|
|
|
06/15/2003 04:56:04 AM · #7 |
| The girl makes the photo without here all you have is a bunch of columns. She adds the interest to the shot. |
|
|
|
06/15/2003 05:21:45 AM · #8 |
hey, that's a good shot dude...
I like it with the girl, since I'm not an very much onto buildings, she gives the picture an very good balance, or may I say... - it is lot a lot more interesting... - it's alife.
v. |
|
|
|
06/15/2003 06:34:40 AM · #9 |
| Nice picture, damitriel. It's not a strong preference but i would prefer the picture without the woman (besides, i find your title a little ho-hum :) Yes, she tells me how tall these columns are but i already have that sense anyway. She seems to me just a little too touristy to add to the shot. I do my best to keep people out of shots unless there is a specific reason to put them in. Might have worked better if she were dressed less touristy and perhaps looking INTO the colonnade (?) instead of out. As i said, not a strong preference. |
|
|
|
06/15/2003 07:27:46 AM · #10 |
| I say, definitely WITH the girl! By the way, nice job getting rid of the people in the background. And I like it in b$w... |
|
|
|
06/15/2003 09:16:47 AM · #11 |
I agree it is a great photo. One thing though that bugs me is that her head is facing the wrong way. It makes me want to see more where she is looking. I think that is what the photographer taking the pictures was doing. The eye should always lead you through the pictures not away.
|
|
|
|
06/15/2003 11:16:22 AM · #12 |
As is?- With the girl.
I agree, I'd prefer to see less of a 'posed' and more 'captured' creature in her place, looking, moving or gesturing 'into' the centre to 'humanize' the architecture and to keep 'tension' or a 'dynamic' in the shot.
|
|
|
|
06/15/2003 11:49:56 AM · #13 |
I too like the girl in it..makes it a much interesting photo...adds a little warmth to an otherwise 'cold' shot of pillars.
|
|
|
|
06/15/2003 11:54:36 AM · #14 |
| With the girl, definitely. In this case it does not bother me that she's looking out of the picture, IMHO it adds a bit of "mystery", makes me wonder, "What is she looking at?", and I like that. |
|
|
|
06/15/2003 09:43:06 PM · #15 |
|
|
|
06/16/2003 04:58:13 AM · #16 |
Originally posted by OneSweetSin:
The girl makes the photo without here all you have is a bunch of columns. She adds the interest to the shot. |
I can see how some folks might like the sterile purity of the just-columns shot, but I prefer it with the girl in.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/07/2025 03:01:07 PM EDT.
