Image |
Comment |
| 04/21/2006 11:01:42 AM |
Growthby madhatterComment: Composition is good, unfortunately the picture is blurry. DOF or focus is off. Leaves are a little over exposed. Detail has been lost which would have worked really well with the background |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 04/21/2006 10:58:47 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 04/21/2006 10:54:51 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 04/21/2006 10:52:34 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 04/17/2006 08:32:52 AM |
Plastic Pornby fotomann_foreverComment: Hi! Hereâs a comment from the Critique Club.
First Impression:
Cute shot! Lots of blown white! Nice lighting on the toys.
Composition:
Good subjects and a very creative activity. I found all the white distracting. Crop may have been a little tight, but not a problem.
Subject:
Meets challenge well. Some voters may not have cared for the title.
Technical:
Focus is good, but I think the DOF is a bit shallow. I would have preferred to see more of the toys in focus.
Summary:
Humorous shot, technically solid, but the white space takes away the âwowâ factor.
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 04/13/2006 05:04:40 AM |
my girl in mykonosby boysetsfireComment: What a great shot! The colours and framing really work. Blue water looks a bit sureal, but the effect is great. The lines of the opening and the placement of the woman really catch the eye. Cloning out some of the "gray" area from three of the blocks would have reduced a distraction, (for me anyway!) |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 04/11/2006 08:15:21 AM |
voidby electinaComment: Hi! Hereâs a comment from the Critique Club.
First Impression:
Neat! I have no idea what it is. My eyes keep getting drawn to the green void
Composition:
Mask has interesting texture. Green mouth area is flat and too centered. Strands are distracting. The green area may have been less objectionable if the lines around the mouth were clean and free of the strands.
Subject:
Definitely meets the challenge. Good eye for seeing the potential in the shot.
Technical:
DOF is shallow.
I like the lighting.
File size is a bit small. You only used 575 X 431. You could have gone to 640 X
Summary:
Congratulations on your best score! Hope to see may more pictures!
Thanks for your comments. Really helps us appreciate your picture.
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 04/10/2006 08:32:38 AM |
Reflectedby sfaliceComment: Hi! Hereâs a comment from the Critique Club.
First Impression:
Fuzzy, nothing is in focus.
Composition:
I like the flower placement and the use of the mirror. Background on the left is a bit busy, I prefer the background on the right side. Nice colours in the flower. The mirror frame is a little distracting due to its angle.
Subject:
Meets the challenge
Technical:
f29 @ 10 sec? Did something move? You should have had lots of DOF. As I mentioned above, nothing was in focus. I would have preferred sharp petal/leaf detail. In your comments you didnât mention if the soft look was intentional. You did use smart sharpen, so Iâm not sure.
Summary:
Back at ya! Thanks for the Déjà vu II critique.
I liked you concept, I think the voting masses didnât like the lack of detail
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 04/06/2006 09:29:08 AM |
Perfect Match Southern Styleby lauraodomComment: Hi! Hereâs a comment from the Critique Club.
First Impression:
Looks interesting! I recognize the déjà vu!
Composition:
Good location for the hat, legs provide nice leading lines. Background nice contrast for the legs. I like the colour and the colour fade of the background. Left foot looks a little stiff. I donât wear high heals, so I donât know if you could have pointed the left toe a little more.
Subject:
Nice adaptation on the original. Meets challenge.
Technical:
Unfortunately you didnât provide any post processing information, so Iâm not sure what you were trying to achieve. I find the picture grainy. A second light, or bounced light could have given more detail to the Hat. The hat & foot create a âblack hole.â The legs almost appear to be over exposed. Some dodging and burning may have helped tone down the legs and bring out more detail in the hat.
Summary:
I liked the concept, but this was a really tough challenge. The pictures needed to really pop technically to do well. Itâs frustrating when a decent scoring picture places so low.
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 04/05/2006 08:29:46 AM |
There Was Water tribute "tazza"by AriskenComment: Hi! Hereâs a comment from the Critique Club.
First Impression:
Nice water fall. Good motion in the water and nice detail in the rocks
Composition:
Very centered head on shot. Bottom looks interesting. Could more of it been shown?
Subject:
Meets challenge, but definitely took a different perspective from the original shot.
Technical:
Unfortunately you didnât include any camera settings or post processing information. I can only guess at what you were trying to do. DOF is good, exposure time captures the water motion well. Some cloning could have gotten rid of some of the distracting white spots on either side of the waterfall.
Suggestions:
In the future could you please include camera settings and pre and post processing steps. It helps us appreciate your photo better.
Summary:
Congratâs on your second 6+ picture. Excellent for only 4 challenges. This was a really tough challenge. You got a 6.152 and only scored 67th! Thatâs frustrating. Looking forward to many more excellent photos.
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/13/2025 12:47:05 AM EDT.