Image |
Comment |
| 06/01/2004 09:40:15 AM |
|
| 05/30/2004 07:21:26 PM |
Brightby rockfishComment by melismatica: I think one of the obvious light sources was flash. This looks like an image that has been washed of detail because of close-up, front flash. This isn't the best approach to the subject matter which depends on color and texture for its visual appeal. |
| 05/30/2004 03:47:06 PM |
Brightby rockfishComment by kevrobertson: parts of this shot are really nice. Washed out at the top of the leaf which slightly spoils it for me. Good luck |
| 05/29/2004 01:30:02 PM |
|
| 05/27/2004 03:51:42 PM |
Brightby rockfishComment by KiwiChris: I can see what you're getting at with this shot, but it's just too iver exposed for me, and the dead-center composition dosn't work that well for this subject. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/26/2004 02:48:02 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/26/2004 01:13:10 PM |
Brightby rockfishComment by e301: ahem. So much flash that it's difficult to tell if there actually is another light source. Obviously you've done this deliberately, from your title, but I don't find anything of interest here. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/26/2004 12:32:57 PM |
|
| 05/26/2004 08:55:42 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/26/2004 08:04:21 AM |
Brightby rockfishComment by cghubbell: Way overexposed - too muhc detail is washed out. Also, there's nothing of particular interest to make this accessible. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/09/2025 11:04:20 AM EDT.