DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 
Challenge Entries
Portfolio Images
This image is not part of a public portfolio.
Nosey Neighbor
Nosey Neighbor
Digipixer


Photograph Information Photographer's Comments
Challenge: Motion (Classic Editing)
Camera: Olympus C-2100UZ
Location: Buffalo Grove,Illinois
Date: Dec 8, 2002
Aperture: f2.8
ISO: 200
Shutter: 1/10
Galleries: Humorous
Date Uploaded: Dec 8, 2002

A macro shot of a Christmas decoration with moving dancers.

Statistics
Place: 134 out of 167
Avg (all users): 4.3402
Avg (commenters): 4.8750
Avg (participants): 4.4907
Avg (non-participants): 4.2180
Views since voting: 1208
Votes: 241
Comments: 11
Favorites: 0


Please log in or register to add your comments!

AuthorThread
12/26/2002 03:47:24 PM
CRITIQUE CLUB!

It's late. I know. I'm sorry. I suck.

I have to laugh at the comments on this one. What's funny to me is that the people with purple shirts seemed to "get it" and the people with the grey shirts didn't (for the most part). Personally, this shot did not appeal to me at first, but the more I look at it, the bigger kick I get out of it.

Framing is an issue. I understand that you were trying to put the focus on the people inside the house, but the focus of the photo, IMO, is really the guy on the outside looking in. To that end, the cropping is a bit tight. I would have tried to include the entire figure of the peeping tom, as well as the peak of the window. Granted, it would detract from the "motion" of the shot, but I think it would make for a better photo. Also, the picture could be straightened just a hair. The windowsill especially shows a slant.

Technically, the photo is well-focused. The lighting inside the house is just perfect, but the lighting on the outside is a bit harsh. Notice the hotspot on the peeper's head, esp., and the way the lighting casts a bluish cast on the snow. The photo probably could have been brightened up somewhat without detracting from the lighting and coloring on the inside. I don't know what your software options are, but you could try playing with the levels and also reducing some of the bluish tint overall to make the colors a bit more natural. (Sidenote: ppl in the forums have been recommending a program call THE GIMP as a free alternative to Photoshop. Poke around online and see if you can get a copy if you're interested in more post-production.)

My last comment, really, is that I can see how some ppl would have a hard time seeing the motion of the dancers (?) inside the house. If you were using a tripod, you could have played around with a variety of shutter speeds to allow you to see if there were some other ways of capturing the dancers so they looked more in motion and less plain blurry.

Overall, a great shot and a great idea. Sorry again this came so late. :)

Rob
  Photographer found comment helpful.
 Comments Made During the Challenge
12/15/2002 11:27:33 AM
As a study in motion, this doesn't tie to the theme.
12/15/2002 10:15:09 AM
Very funny and seasonal.
12/14/2002 06:03:07 PM
Don't see the relationship with motion in this one?
12/11/2002 06:18:36 PM
LOL, pretty funny.
12/11/2002 02:34:42 AM
This is a very cute photograph but I do not see how it represents motion.

Addendum: Now I see the movement..... it took me awhile. This is one of the most clever ideas in the contest this week. Good luck.
12/10/2002 07:51:04 PM
very clever and well done shot
12/10/2002 10:44:21 AM
Nice enough photo. It's a bit distracting to have the insides of the building be out of focus. Were they moving? 6 waltoml.
12/09/2002 11:20:46 AM
SORRY, BUT I JUST DON'T SEE THE MOTION
12/09/2002 03:43:48 AM
am not seeing the motion in the photo
12/08/2002 07:22:45 PM
INteresting photo


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/07/2025 12:46:08 PM EDT.