Author | Thread |
|
04/06/2011 08:10:55 AM |
Originally posted by EL-ROI: Look at that, you used f11... wonder how you got such a short focal length at 60mm.
Guessing the subject distance and inputing your stats in DOF calculator you get the following results:
Subject distance 3 ft
Depth of field
Near limit 2.85 ft
Far limit 3.16 ft
Total 0.31 ft
In front of subject 0.15 ft (47%)
Behind subject 0.16 ft (53%)
............................................
Subject distance 5 ft
Depth of field
Near limit 4.6 ft
Far limit 5.48 ft
Total 0.88 ft
In front of subject 0.4 ft (46%)
Behind subject 0.48 ft (54%)
.............................................
Subject distance 6 ft
Depth of field
Near limit 5.43 ft
Far limit 6.71 ft
Total 1.28 ft
In front of subject 0.57 ft (45%)
Behind subject 0.71 ft (55%)
.............................................
Subject distance 8 ft
Depth of field
Near limit 7.01 ft
Far limit 9.32 ft
Total 2.32 ft
In front of subject 0.99 ft (43%)
Behind subject 1.32 ft (57%)
sorry for cluttering up your comments... just going to school on your image!! |
(The distance was < 12 cm) It's a miniature cactus
Thanks
Tareq |
|
|
04/06/2011 05:58:32 AM |
Look at that, you used f11... wonder how you got such a short focal length at 60mm.
Guessing the subject distance and inputing your stats in DOF calculator you get the following results:
Subject distance 3 ft
Depth of field
Near limit 2.85 ft
Far limit 3.16 ft
Total 0.31 ft
In front of subject 0.15 ft (47%)
Behind subject 0.16 ft (53%)
............................................
Subject distance 5 ft
Depth of field
Near limit 4.6 ft
Far limit 5.48 ft
Total 0.88 ft
In front of subject 0.4 ft (46%)
Behind subject 0.48 ft (54%)
.............................................
Subject distance 6 ft
Depth of field
Near limit 5.43 ft
Far limit 6.71 ft
Total 1.28 ft
In front of subject 0.57 ft (45%)
Behind subject 0.71 ft (55%)
.............................................
Subject distance 8 ft
Depth of field
Near limit 7.01 ft
Far limit 9.32 ft
Total 2.32 ft
In front of subject 0.99 ft (43%)
Behind subject 1.32 ft (57%)
sorry for cluttering up your comments... just going to school on your image!! |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Comments Made During the Challenge  |
|
04/05/2011 02:10:45 AM |
Simply beautiful. Works great and this has my vote 8 |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/04/2011 03:52:24 PM |
the lighting is stunning and the composition very good - i just wish you would have tried to get this in a 8x10 to really give it a Weston feel |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/04/2011 03:51:01 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/02/2011 07:54:52 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/31/2011 07:20:33 AM |
very nice. Excellent original work. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/30/2011 09:13:46 PM |
Lovely. The cactus looks great in b/w, and the soft shape of the blooms is a great contrast to the spines of the cactus. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/30/2011 07:31:36 AM |
This is gorgeous. The control of the light is perfect, highlighting the bright flowers just enough to prevent the image from being swallowed by all the black. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/30/2011 05:19:37 AM |
There's something about this that I like. The low key lighting is great. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/30/2011 04:46:31 AM |
Awesome lighting, great form. I think this is something Weston would have photographed had he encountered it! Great blacks and shadow, you did well with limiting the highlights. One thing I see that was not indicative of a Weston photo is the use of DoF. You used a shallower DoF than what I have seen in the Weston works that I have viewed. I think he would have shot this at f8, f11, f22, somewhere around there. I do really like this! |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/29/2011 09:09:31 PM |
like the idea, the lighting works as well |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/08/2025 01:46:50 AM EDT.