Author | Thread |
|
03/19/2011 03:39:41 PM |
Congrats on the high finish. Well deserved, my friend. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/19/2011 03:00:42 PM |
Nice Job!!!! Congrats!!!!! |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/18/2011 02:40:36 PM |
Nice photo. I don't have the skill or patience to pull something like this off.
I just got a new tripod with a level and was wondering about your comment:
The terrain is level, as determined by the double bubble level on my hot shoe.
It looks like the horizon and foreground are slanting from left to right. With that in mind, wouldn't the double bubble level be showing that it is your camera that is level and not the terrain?
Thanks |
|
|
03/18/2011 01:05:22 PM |
Congrats on a nice finish, Richard! |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/18/2011 09:52:00 AM |
Originally posted by Bear_Music: ....
I was at ISO 400 to your 200, and f/5.6 to your f/4.0 ΓΆ€” so those cancel each other out. You gave approximately 3 stops more exposure than I did. I was shooting an hour and a half after sunset, and closer to civilization than you, so I expect that gives me a somewhat higher level of ambient light, perhaps a stop's worth. My image was (deliberately) underexposed by a couple stops so as not to blow out the stars, and then brightened in post, so that accounts for the rest of the difference. Here's the resized-but-unaltered RAW:
How does that compare to your unprocessed RAW? |
My resized-but-unaltered RAW: I agree with your comparison analysis. |
|
|
03/18/2011 09:25:43 AM |
Originally posted by hahn23: Originally posted by LevT: excellent shot, and the "surprize" herd of elk is just an icing on the cake. congratulations!
(it must have been pretty dark there for such a long exposure at f/4. compare that with 180s in Robert's shot with f/5.6... and also moonlit, presumably by the same moon :)... do you understand it?) |
No, not entirely! I was shooting after the end of astronomical twilight. It was very dark. Maybe Robert had some twilight left.... or light pollution from civilization on the East coast. The ONLY source of my light was the waxing crescent 24% moon. Had I used 180s, I would have had very little exposure. Mystery to me! I could not see the light pollution from Fort Collins, but it registered on the sensor. |
I was at ISO 400 to your 200, and f/5.6 to your f/4.0 ΓΆ€” so those cancel each other out. You gave approximately 3 stops more exposure than I did. I was shooting an hour and a half after sunset, and closer to civilization than you, so I expect that gives me a somewhat higher level of ambient light, perhaps a stop's worth. My image was (deliberately) underexposed by a couple stops so as not to blow out the stars, and then brightened in post, so that accounts for the rest of the difference. Here's the resized-but-unaltered RAW:
How does that compare to your unprocessed RAW?
|
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/18/2011 08:56:25 AM |
Richard, "luck" is just another word for opportunity + skill :-)
Gorgeous image. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/18/2011 07:35:49 AM |
Very well done Richard. Can't for the life of me figure out how you could get anything less than a 6 on this. I think it's due to maybe voters think this technique is supposed to be easy or something. Anyway, congrats on an outstanding image, I knew this was yours the second I saw it! Outstanding effort with going out in the middle of the night to do this. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/17/2011 09:39:29 PM |
Originally posted by LevT: excellent shot, and the "surprize" herd of elk is just an icing on the cake. congratulations!
(it must have been pretty dark there for such a long exposure at f/4. compare that with 180s in Robert's shot with f/5.6... and also moonlit, presumably by the same moon :)... do you understand it?) |
No, not entirely! I was shooting after the end of astronomical twilight. It was very dark. Maybe Robert had some twilight left.... or light pollution from civilization on the East coast. The ONLY source of my light was the waxing crescent 24% moon. Had I used 180s, I would have had very little exposure. Mystery to me! I could not see the light pollution from Fort Collins, but it registered on the sensor. |
|
|
03/17/2011 09:27:10 PM |
excellent shot, and the "surprize" herd of elk is just an icing on the cake. congratulations!
(it must have been pretty dark there for such a long exposure at f/4. compare that with 180s in Robert's shot with f/5.6... and also moonlit, presumably by the same moon :)... do you understand it?) |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/17/2011 08:09:37 PM |
You were right, but I should have been. Congrats on a stunning image. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/17/2011 08:08:34 PM |
I had a feeling this shot was yours... Really a wonderful image. Congrats on the top 5! oh and thanks for posting all the info on your shot, helps us noobs try to figure this night gig out... |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/17/2011 08:07:09 PM |
I see you got your 4th, Richard! Congrats! |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Comments Made During the Challenge  |
|
03/17/2011 02:59:00 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/16/2011 12:53:28 PM |
This is Sweet! What are those little lines at the bottom right of the horizon and where was this taken? Good Job! |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/16/2011 10:32:48 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/15/2011 06:42:27 PM |
Fairly incredible. Something about it makes me want to shake it left, but then we'd have even more star trails. Fantastic capture. Exposure is true to day, yet those stars... awesome. And a herd of deer? Elk? Wow. An unexpected benefit of this theme. Excellent. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/15/2011 07:02:37 AM |
must have been some planes flying by they make interesting patterns...great job on the stars |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/14/2011 05:24:17 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/12/2011 04:34:03 AM |
I love your camera position which shows the long exposure so well. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/12/2011 02:16:16 AM |
Fantastic shot! Love the depth and the color. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/11/2011 10:39:35 PM |
A fascinating scene highlighting the beauty of nature. Multiple contrails denote the presence of man. As a critique, I think you could have leveraged the location of Polaris in avoiding a pseudo-centered composition. 7 |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/11/2011 02:37:38 PM |
Very impressive -- my favorite of the bunch! This really does a great job of doing what the challenge suggested -- looking like daylight while keeping elements of night. I expect to see a ribbon on this one. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/11/2011 12:34:31 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/11/2011 04:16:54 AM |
Beautiful Star trail. Colors are vibrant. Great detail for what must have been a dark location. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/11/2011 03:05:19 AM |
I would love to see a more interesting foreground but the exposure is nice and I really love the star trails and how the curvature matches nicely with the tree line. Well done. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/11/2011 02:26:02 AM |
Wonderfully done!! My favorite of the challenge no doubt. To have amazing star trails plus wildlife so clear is simply breathtaking. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/10/2011 10:29:04 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/10/2011 07:34:31 PM |
Striking image, love the little tilt to the camera as well... 10 |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/08/2025 05:04:31 AM EDT.