OK so they're not very hidden...so sue me! :-) We played hooky and went to the rebuilt covered bridge in Wakefield, Quebec, located about 30 min from downtown Ottawa. Think the original got destroyed in 1917 and it was rebuilt in 1997. Now used only for foot traffic. And seeing that it is a bridge, meaning it goes over water, there are many people who enjoy leaping/diving off the bridge into the water below. Both Ryan and I jumped off the bridge for the first time that day! It's pretty high up, a good 30 feet or so.
pp: crop, rotate, curves, contrast, resize, usm, save for web
Statistics
Place: 49 out of 73 Avg (all users): 5.3583 Avg (commenters): 6.0000 Avg (participants): 5.0909 Avg (non-participants): 5.4598 Views since voting: 668 Views during voting: 316 Votes: 120 Comments: 6 Favorites: 0
Okay seriously, I am getting one of your shots again!!!!! I am sure you are sick of my 'indepth' comments by now LOL
Anywayssssssssssss,,,,, In voting I gave this an 8, here are the reasons why.
I didn't think that this was over exposed, I think this could have been dodged a little more to bring out those tiles. now i know that you horizon is not tilted, but the under neigh of the bridge is and that is more prominent because it is red.
so a little more expose would work with this shot, you are sharp and clean on your lines. saturations are good
Fun shot! And I think they're hidden just fine! I like this level of waldo so much better than the ones that were next to impossible. I wonder if I would have the guts to jump. But then I thought, if everyone else was jumping off a bridge... :D
You jumped off the bridge? Are you NUTS?? :-) (Are there pictures??) This does need a little something - I think brightness or light end maybe? But I do think it's a good job of hiding the Waldo(s).
Add photograph to your favorites
Add photographer to your favorites
Photographer found comment helpful.
