| Author | Thread |
Comments Made During the Challenge  |
|
|
03/30/2009 06:27:16 PM |
| I've been using the definition: "Of, relating to, or being a style of art in which natural objects are not represented realistically." With this in mind, it just seems blurry. |
|
|
|
03/30/2009 03:21:19 PM |
| You definitely did a good job with the motion blur. |
|
|
|
03/30/2009 02:02:58 PM |
| Not abstract enough for me. |
|
|
|
03/30/2009 04:47:50 AM |
| oh dear, thats a little depressing. Makes me want to fall into the grave, yet I really don't, not yet..... |
|
|
|
03/29/2009 12:59:18 PM |
| the motion is apparent but that alone doesn't qualify for an abstract, to me. |
|
|
|
03/28/2009 11:36:51 AM |
| I don't understand the movement in the fact that I do not see any. I'm not sure the abstract quality . |
|
|
|
03/28/2009 10:10:51 AM |
| Nice feeling of movement here. |
|
|
|
03/28/2009 07:26:50 AM |
|
|
|
03/26/2009 05:23:48 PM |
| Hauntingly effective. Well done. |
|
|
|
03/25/2009 06:16:02 PM |
|
|
|
03/25/2009 07:23:38 AM |
| Simply not abstract enough I believe, and the motion is far too subtle. Despite the movement of the camera, this remains a very static scene. |
|
 Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/07/2025 01:42:03 AM EDT.
Add photograph to your favorites
Add photographer to your favorites
