Author | Thread |
|
03/15/2009 10:09:44 PM |
For the people who have doubts about the age of this tree: the location is at nearly 6000 feet, so one would expect a slow growth and it made an old impression on me. How it is possible to guess the trunk diameter without a reference is beyond me, it was certainly more than 14 inches! |
|
Comments Made During the Challenge  |
|
03/15/2009 07:43:57 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/15/2009 03:00:12 PM |
Great use of the snow to show off all those twisting branches. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/13/2009 08:40:46 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/12/2009 06:01:22 PM |
Interesting tree. The darkness in the corners distracts me a bit |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/10/2009 04:40:52 PM |
This is just my opinion, any tree over 100 years needs to be at least 14 inches thick. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/09/2009 05:47:16 PM |
Nice tree just too closely cropped for me. I really good picture though. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/09/2009 07:55:52 AM |
I really like this image and I've scored it well. If growing at a fairly high altitude, it could be about 100 years old. 8 |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/09/2009 07:30:44 AM |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/07/2025 05:56:03 AM EDT.