Author | Thread |
|
05/12/2004 03:50:40 AM |
Wow can't believe how badly this did. I see what you were trying to do and in my opinion you did it very well. Deserved to finish with 6. All those stupid comments about lack of focus. Some people... |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Comments Made During the Challenge  |
|
05/11/2004 10:16:03 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
05/10/2004 06:28:06 PM |
Composition: Subject Placement, Cropping, Background 5
Technical: Focus, Exposure, Lighting, Processing 9
Appeal: Is it Interesting, Motivating, Etc.? 4
How well does it meet the challenge: 10
Total Averaged Rating 7.00 Dick
|
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
05/10/2004 04:33:35 PM |
I'm not sure about this DOF ... don't like it very much ... but good idea ... |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
05/09/2004 05:29:13 PM |
I might have reversed the focused objects |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
05/09/2004 10:24:08 AM |
Composition: Subject Placement, Cropping, Background 7
Technical: Focus, Exposure, Lighting, Processing 7
Appeal: Is it Interesting, Motivating, Etc. 6
How well does it meet the challenge: 8
Total Averaged Rating(Rounded) 7
|
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
05/08/2004 06:41:50 AM |
good idead, but I think I would have made the further car in focus. That's what I look at when I see te title "Long Term Parking". |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
05/08/2004 06:11:13 AM |
|
|
05/08/2004 01:04:45 AM |
Not sure if ti's an attempt to be interesting with the out of focus car, and frankly I'm not sure if it perhaps even is, but it leaves me wondering and with a feeling that it should have been in focus. There's nothing in the front car(?) to see.
I get a lot of these pictures myself with the aid of "focus on nearest object" autofocus and I rarely keep them. However the colors are nice and the composition is working even it is odd, so I'll leave you with an average score. |
|
|
05/07/2004 02:47:40 PM |
I find the background very distracting. Maybe you could have tried using a greater DOF. |
|
|
05/07/2004 04:53:58 AM |
Great shot. And much better than mine :) |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
05/07/2004 03:35:39 AM |
|
|
05/06/2004 06:10:27 PM |
|
|
05/06/2004 10:35:03 AM |
My eyes are drawn to the car at the top of the picture, but since it is not in focus, my eyes start to cross. Thus taking an interesting picture, and making it not one I want to look at for long. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
05/06/2004 05:56:37 AM |
Focusing on the background car would have been more interesting. Super depth of field would have been fabulous. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
05/06/2004 02:47:59 AM |
the car catches your eye, after that you're just looking for something in fokus...
-7 |
|
|
05/05/2004 11:14:12 PM |
hmmm....the wreck in the back looks more interesting than the large expanse of rusted whatever in the foreground. Still it's an interesting slant on the subject. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
05/05/2004 01:58:01 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
05/05/2004 11:02:23 AM |
Too bad that the car in the rear wasn't in focus. |
|
|
05/04/2004 11:46:07 PM |
I think the swapped focus will kill this, but I happen to really enjoy it. Nice job! |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/07/2025 02:21:08 PM EDT.