| Author | Thread |
|
|
04/18/2003 12:24:24 PM |
| How did you do the double exposure? |
|
|
|
01/17/2003 12:01:31 PM |
| Excellent imagination - ImageStacker, I presume? *wink* |
|
Comments Made During the Challenge  |
|
|
10/27/2002 08:22:00 AM |
|
|
|
10/26/2002 08:11:00 PM |
| I'd be very interested in learning how you accomplished this. This looks like a double-exposure - can you do this with a digital camera? The only thing I do not like about this photo is that the lamp on the right is too bright. |
|
|
|
10/26/2002 07:53:00 AM |
|
|
|
10/25/2002 08:43:00 AM |
| Pretty cool shot. How did u do it? U should submit this one for this weeks challenge of 'Illusions'....i give u a 9 - vw4lyfe |
|
|
|
10/24/2002 01:28:00 PM |
| i love the effect you captured with this shot, very nicely done |
|
|
|
10/23/2002 07:32:00 PM |
| Any memories that I have along this line don't include a "made" bed! And, sorry, but for me, "romantic getaway" doesn't really fit this scene - this looks more like "Days Inn near the Motorcycle Races". lhall |
|
|
|
10/23/2002 06:45:00 AM |
| What a great idea! But WHY a pillow? should have used a beautiful piece of lingerie |
|
|
|
10/23/2002 04:14:00 AM |
Obviously this was done with a slow shutter speed but how come there is no blur from moving off the bed (or is there - am I not looking close enough)?
Shots like this always fascinate me, simply because I don't think my camera can do it! |
|
|
|
10/22/2002 09:53:00 PM |
|
|
|
10/22/2002 07:17:00 PM |
| Shades of Duane Michels! Well done, interestingly conceived (no pun intended!) |
|
|
|
10/22/2002 06:56:00 PM |
|
|
|
10/22/2002 06:29:00 PM |
Are double exposures allowed? I hope so.
Lets assume they are then. The light is a dramatic feature, and is not dramatically highlighting the primary subject which is the challenge. Sorry to have to deduct points from an otherwise creative piece of work. |
|
|
|
10/21/2002 09:30:00 PM |
| I really like the idea here. The setting isn't all that great. Shooting closer (cutting out most of the room) and getting rid of the ugly bedspread would help. Even just a close up of her on a pillow with part of a sheet over her - not even seeing the light - would be nice. ~indigo997 |
|
|
|
10/21/2002 09:24:00 PM |
| I'd like to know how this is done within the editing constraints. I'm sure there is a way; just want to know. 7 Jak |
|
|
|
10/21/2002 03:02:00 PM |
| It never ceases to amaze me the extent some people will go to just to get porn into this. They will stretch the challenge almost to the breaking point. Even though it is a very unique photo and I'm not sure how you did it your grade is the same. Take this to a porn site where you might get better scores. |
|
|
|
10/21/2002 01:57:00 PM |
| Wow. You get to sleep around with a ghost. Nice shot. 8 |
|
|
|
10/21/2002 10:41:00 AM |
| Nice. Good idea. Unfortunatly, the lighting and especially the framing are uninspiring to me. 5 |
|
|
|
10/21/2002 10:21:00 AM |
| Interesting, but the colors are slightly muted giving it a flat look. Maybe some saturation (difficult with skin tones) or bumping up the contrast a bit? karmat |
|
|
|
10/21/2002 09:14:00 AM |
| niice : ) .. btw u should never get on top of the bed cover in a hotel. chem tests have proven there is gross stuff there : ) |
|
|
|
10/21/2002 01:28:00 AM |
| I get the idea which is good but the settingis quite plain. The clock and the telephone are way out |
|
|
|
10/20/2002 09:54:00 PM |
| that is a cool shot. I can see kinda how you did this shot I think. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/06/2025 10:32:46 PM EDT.
Add photograph to your favorites
Add photographer to your favorites
