Author | Thread |
Comments Made During the Challenge  |
|
01/23/2007 11:40:57 AM |
Interesting, nice use of colors, but does not do much for me beyond that, and I'm not seeing a connection to the challenge. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
01/22/2007 09:15:16 PM |
it's an overdone photo... but it's well done here! |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
01/22/2007 03:42:51 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
01/21/2007 10:17:49 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
01/20/2007 05:59:49 PM |
isn't a subject supposed to be in focus? |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
01/20/2007 05:15:47 PM |
not a motion pan, nice abstract though |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
01/20/2007 09:31:45 AM |
I don't see anything in focus |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
01/19/2007 06:31:57 PM |
nice shot, but 1) there's nothing in focus, and 2) i don't think you understood the technique. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
01/19/2007 04:11:33 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
01/19/2007 09:10:15 AM |
I don't think the meets the challenge. I don't see any panning here. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
01/18/2007 07:25:16 PM |
On a scale of 0-2 in five different categories: Image quality - .5. Composition - .5. Lighting - 1.5. Post Processing - 1. Choice of Subject - 0. TOTAL SCORE - 4 |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
01/18/2007 09:49:28 AM |
This shot is missing a moving subject. What are you panning on? It does show motion, though. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
01/17/2007 08:11:04 PM |
great photo... it just doesn't meet the challenge requirements. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
01/17/2007 06:17:14 PM |
I can't tell what the subject is nor what is getting the motion effect. Try again. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
01/17/2007 11:46:17 AM |
Interesting picture. But I think for this challenge you should have at least something in focus as a refference point. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
01/17/2007 10:29:03 AM |
Isn't panning designed to show clearly some foreground interest? A conceptually different 5. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
01/17/2007 09:04:32 AM |
doesn't convey motion panning to me - just movement. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
01/17/2007 07:58:29 AM |
I like this image quite a bit, but it isn't panning. There is no subject being panned against a background, here the subject is moving with everything else. Panning would be more like if you were to point the camera out the side window of your car, and you'd get a vehicle driving along at the same speed as yours, then you might get panning (sort of, actually it's not real panning). Real panning would be you standing by the side of the road and following a car driving by with the camera, moving the camera at the same speed (relative) as the car while holding down the shutter. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
01/17/2007 04:09:22 AM |
I dont see your main subject |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
01/17/2007 02:52:15 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
01/17/2007 01:39:00 AM |
in a motion panning, the subject should be sharp, shouldn't he? |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
01/16/2007 08:30:14 PM |
Interesting photo - but not motion panning. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
01/16/2007 08:26:03 PM |
Not really getting a feeling of panning in this shot. This just looks blurry to me. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
01/16/2007 08:08:43 PM |
Not sure what this is, but it aint motion panning. Sorry. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/07/2025 05:56:56 AM EDT.