| Author | Thread |
|
|
12/21/2006 12:33:31 PM |
Originally posted by Gaby_G:
Julia, you must set the correct date and time on your camera, also you need to say wich cameras do you own, so when you are asked for validation you will not be DQ`d for an "incorrect" exif data... |
Not sure that is the case though.
ImageDescription -
Make - SONY
Model - DSC-P41
Orientation -
XResolution - 72
YResolution - 72
ResolutionUnit - Inch
DateTime - 2004:09:01 20:29:49
YCbCrPositioning - Co-Sited
ExifOffset - 255
ExposureTime - 1/8 seconds
FNumber - 2.80
ExposureProgram - Landscape mode
ISOSpeedRatings - 100
ExifVersion - 0220
DateTimeOriginal - 2004:09:01 20:29:49
DateTimeDigitized - 2004:09:01 20:29:49
ComponentsConfiguration - YCbCr
CompressedBitsPerPixel - 8 (bits/pixel)
ExposureBiasValue - -1.00
MaxApertureValue - F 2.77
MeteringMode - Multi-segment
LightSource - Cloudy weather
Flash - Not fired, compulsory flash mode
FocalLength - 5.00 mm (that is the wide angle focal length on the DSC-P41 - would be a fisheye on a A100)
FlashPixVersion - 0100
ColorSpace - Uncalibrated
ExifImageWidth - 378
ExifImageHeight - 600
InteroperabilityOffset - 742
FileSource - DSC - Digital still camera
SceneType - A directly photographed image
CustomRendered - Normal process
ExposureMode - Manual
WhiteBalance - Manual
SceneCaptureType - Landscape
Contrast - Normal
Saturation - Normal
Sharpness - Normal
??
Message edited by author 2006-12-21 17:44:15. |
|
|
|
12/20/2006 12:00:26 PM |
Julia, you must set the correct date and time on your camera, also you need to say wich cameras do you own, so when you are asked for validation you will not be DQ`d for an "incorrect" exif data... And you really need to retain your original unedited files (whenever you are going to edit an image, made a copy and work on it, exif can show if you have edited your image) You will be asked for validation if someone thinks you made an ilegal editing or you picture place in the first places (I don`t remember if the first 5 or 10).
This is a really nice picture, you have a lot of talent and I hope you will keep submitting, just be sure to be doing it the right way so you will not have more bad moments like this.
Good Luck! |
|
 Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
12/19/2006 08:01:40 PM |
this pic wasnt taken 2 years ago!
it was take when i read the challange.
why does it day i took it 2 year ago?
does it have something to do with the set date on my camera?
cuz i dont think its on the right date..
crud. can anything worse happen...? |
|
|
|
12/19/2006 08:44:12 AM |
Taken with a Sony DSC-P41 on 2004:09:01 20:29:49
Shame - was(is) a good image too.
|
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
12/19/2006 08:33:10 AM |
two-year-old pictures might be tough to recover... |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
12/19/2006 04:57:17 AM |
Use //www.pcinspector.de/file_recovery/uk/download.htm and get it back from your camera.
Message edited by author 2006-12-19 10:00:47. |
|
|
|
12/18/2006 10:46:36 PM |
Originally posted by Juliadavis:
oh dear!
i hope this doesnt get removed..
i cant find the original!
and they want prof of validation.
i sayed up all night worrying about this.
the thing that annoys me is that im sure this is a valid entry.
if i could just find my original! *sob* |
is your computer that big a mess that you cannot find the original?
I allways make a subfolder 'processed' in the folder with the original files, so you allways know where your originals are.
and back up baby! ;-)
it's a shame though, I liked the picture :-) |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
12/18/2006 02:50:06 PM |
That's a shame, I was looking forward to discovering how this was achieved without spot editing.
oh well
|
|
|
|
12/18/2006 02:34:52 PM |
oh dear!
i hope this doesnt get removed..
i cant find the original!
and they want prof of validation.
i sayed up all night worrying about this.
the thing that annoys me is that im sure this is a valid entry.
if i could just find my original! *sob* |
|
|
|
12/18/2006 08:34:18 AM |
| Wonderful image Julia! Congrats on making it into the top-10. I hope your original shows up. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
12/17/2006 05:27:32 PM |
| An incisive composition whose visual lingers long after its viewing. Congratulations on your 6th place. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
12/17/2006 01:44:36 AM |
Originally posted by Pug-H:
Congratulations on such a high placement in your first Challenge.
It's a really atmospheric photo, befitting the period you try to evoke - but I think you mean the 19th century (i.e. the 1800s), as there would have been no grave yard like that along the Tweed in the 1790s. ;>þ |
oh...woops.
well i must have read the sign wrong. cuz it said 18thcentury |
|
|
|
12/16/2006 10:41:30 AM |
| Great shot... really good work... oh and welcome to DPC.... |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
12/16/2006 02:11:40 AM |
Congratulations on such a high placement in your first Challenge.
It's a really atmospheric photo, befitting the period you try to evoke - but I think you mean the 19th century (i.e. the 1800s), as there would have been no grave yard like that along the Tweed in the 1790s. ;>þ |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
12/16/2006 01:09:48 AM |
Originally posted by sherpet:
I am just so impressed with your talant my girl, especially the way you came sixth in your forst challengwe. Well done girl, and even more pleased that you are an "Aussie" like us..... Way to go Julia.....
Keep in touch, and I really look forward to many more images from you..... |
woo ausies rule!
i entered in the Pink Floyd comp.
so keep an eye out for my next image.
|
|
|
|
12/16/2006 12:29:35 AM |
I am just so impressed with your talent my girl, especially the way you came sixth in your first challengwe. Well done girl, and even more pleased that you are an "Aussie" like us..... Way to go Julia.....
Keep in touch, and I really look forward to many more images from you.....
Message edited by author 2006-12-18 22:51:15. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
12/15/2006 02:07:47 PM |
Originally posted by snackwells:
I think it's legal (desat everything but reds and adjust hue?).
|
Yes, I once processed an outdoor shot where everything but the dress of the model was desaturated (and skintones actually too, since the dress matched the skintones) and it was legal in basic. My feeling is that it's pretty rare for a shot to be like this - without some tiny spots of color in the desaturated bits - but I do know it's possible. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
12/14/2006 04:14:32 PM |
Originally posted by xXxscarletxXx:
It is a very beautiful photo but I'm wondering the legality of it... |
I think it's legal (desat everything but reds and adjust hue?).
In any event, this is a fascinating and haunting image. Well done! |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
12/14/2006 02:03:41 PM |
| It is a very beautiful photo but I'm wondering the legality of it... |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
12/13/2006 07:56:58 AM |
| What a spectacular photograph!!!!! |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
12/13/2006 07:28:20 AM |
| Very moody and deliberated composition. Excellent outcome of your first submission. Congrats! |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
12/13/2006 04:46:27 AM |
| Congratulations on a top ten spot in this difficult challenge. Execellent photography and a great way to tell a story. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
12/13/2006 01:15:33 AM |
wonderful mysterious shot.
the only thing i don't like about it, is that she is looking into the camera and that her back is so round, sort of distracts from the rather high tension in the photo. just my opinion, nice photography though |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
12/12/2006 08:14:44 PM |
i hate the fact that a / thingy managed to get into my title.
its suppost to be 'he's here now'. now people are gonna think its
'hells here now'
oh well.
6th place? ...hmmm.
i guess i should be happy.. |
|
|
|
12/12/2006 07:46:48 PM |
| This is quite striking. I wouldn't personally have placed mine over this one. Congrats on top 10! |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
12/12/2006 07:13:50 PM |
| Sheesh, should have ribboned. I like the top shots but I've gotta say I'm getting a bit too tired of landscapes... |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
12/12/2006 07:13:21 PM |
| Teehee.. The suspense came to an end.. The second the challenge was calculated I came to your pic.. I had a feeling it was this one.. It really is very good.. And congrats on such a great score and position.. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
Comments Made During the Challenge  |
|
|
12/11/2006 03:53:30 PM |
| Very nicely done with the selective desaturation. I like the mood in this shot. 8 |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
12/11/2006 02:17:47 PM |
| Beautiful shot! Love the post processing with just the dress showing up in color! Bumping this one |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
12/11/2006 09:08:42 AM |
| Incredibly authentic art deco feel. Wow. Instant 10. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
12/10/2006 08:36:49 PM |
| Very surreal and beautiful.. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
12/10/2006 05:01:45 PM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
12/09/2006 06:45:05 AM |
| Love the way the red stands out against the sepia tones! Kinda spooky.... I also like the softness - it helps exaggerate the eerie feel - Nicely done. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
12/08/2006 09:31:11 PM |
| I wonder if this will ribbon. It is wonderfully amazingly beautiful... the processing is magical. Only thing that keeps it from being a perfect image to me (but didn't keep it from a perfect score) is the diagonal line at the bottom left... sort of breaks up the background a little. The soft effect at the edges and a dramatic desaturation like this is great to see in a basic editing challenge. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
12/08/2006 09:46:01 AM |
| really hard to make out what is in the picture, but I do like the red/sepia tone |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
12/08/2006 08:28:30 AM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
12/07/2006 02:07:20 PM |
| This is beautifull photography.......I just love it!!!!! |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
12/07/2006 02:00:34 PM |
| This is a wonderfully mystical and sinisterly enchanted image! The red is a wonderful lead, one of the few times I've seen selective saturation REALLY work well. Maybe lost a bit of detail in the shadows, but that's an almost insignificant pick. One of my favorites for sure! 8o) |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
12/07/2006 12:39:58 PM |
| oow wow the dress is awesome and it looks nice in this setting. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
12/07/2006 09:50:06 AM |
| My only 10. It's haunting and so well thought out. Love the tones and the scarlett red dress. Very otherwordly. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
12/07/2006 07:56:53 AM |
| How do you do with basic editing? Looks great. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
12/07/2006 03:02:58 AM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
12/06/2006 06:41:33 PM |
| great photography! Ill give it a 10 from Marcus Brincat |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
12/06/2006 09:35:21 AM |
| very Mucha. i dig it, but i'm not a fan of selective desat. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
12/06/2006 06:30:07 AM |
| great shot, but gotta ask.......how was this done without selection tools being used??? |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
12/06/2006 05:01:53 AM |
| Wow geat shot, love the editing on it. Looking forward to seeing how it was done. Great work. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
12/05/2006 08:06:07 PM |
| gorgeous. one of my favs of the challenge. hope this does well!! |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
12/05/2006 08:00:50 PM |
|
Add photograph to your favorites
Add photographer to your favorites
