Author | Thread |
Comments Made During the Challenge  |
|
08/17/2002 07:30:00 AM |
I hate to say it but JohnS did a photo allot like this a few months ago. It is a good photo so I will give it a (6) |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
08/16/2002 11:00:00 AM |
Actually, 13 min. 51 to 54 sec, but that's picking nit. Nice shot. The only thing I don't really like is how the outer ring came out. The 20 is almost missing and the 10 and 30 are hard to see, the rest are better....8 Swash |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
08/15/2002 10:37:00 AM |
I have to just wonder, if the same person did this one as did the last one in the transitions challenge. I like how the second hand rests right on the the marks. I like the texture in the wrist band. There is a small yellow something to the right of the watch. Good job capturing this one, and good luck in the challenge. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
08/15/2002 04:13:00 AM |
I love the concept. And the photo is very well executed. No harsh shadows or bright spots. There is a nice obscure reference to the something new challenge which can easily be deduced by looking at the picture for longer than a few seconds. One rant thought...what an odd choice of time....14 minutes? This might have confused a few people as I would have probably gone for 12:00 with the seconds hand going from 12 to 4 seconds.....I understand it's hard to capture but it's certainly doable... |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
08/15/2002 02:36:00 AM |
nice! The sharpness looks a tiny bit flat, but this is a nicely composed photo... good work :) - jmsetzler |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
08/14/2002 08:05:00 AM |
I liked this pic. It almost seems like time can exist all at the same time - like there is no past present or future. Something to ponder on the new day. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
08/14/2002 07:36:00 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
08/14/2002 04:37:00 AM |
wicked second hand! Nice absence of reflection. well done. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
08/13/2002 10:40:00 PM |
The motion of the second hand is good. Lighting and color are fine. I'd like a tiughter crop. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
08/13/2002 06:20:00 PM |
Something new. Composition - quite good Technical Aspects - quite good. Meets Challenge - not obvious without title. Visual Impact / Originality – pretty good Jim msp
|
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
08/13/2002 01:33:00 PM |
Nicely taken photo, nice contrast and layout. Just doesn't grab me visually as much as some others this week. Technically really like it though. Crisp and clean. 5, Kavey |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
08/13/2002 11:39:00 AM |
Nice, sharp image. Too bad you can't either shoot at a faster speed or stop the second hand. 7 |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
08/13/2002 09:15:00 AM |
good shot on the second hand! great lighting, focus. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
08/13/2002 01:37:00 AM |
This is a great shot and a great idea. I really like the use of second hand to show time passing – none of us are getting any younger :-( I can't fault it technically; it's a tough shot, a clever idea and you've done it wellâ€Â¦ (10) |
|
|
08/12/2002 09:52:00 PM |
Did you notice how long your shutter was open? Pretty cool! |
|
|
08/12/2002 04:50:00 PM |
Composition8 Technical Aspects7 Appeal6 Creativity5 Rating7Autool
|
|
|
08/12/2002 02:46:00 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
08/12/2002 01:59:00 PM |
Nice quadruple exp... 9 nards656 |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
08/12/2002 01:43:00 PM |
very crisp shot...love the prolonged exposure effect..good job! |
|
|
08/12/2002 01:39:00 PM |
I like the picture, but I think I would have set the hands at exactly 12:00, and gotten the ticks of the second hand passing the 12. JMHO |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
08/12/2002 01:06:00 PM |
|
|
08/12/2002 10:33:00 AM |
Good, clean shot. Nice contrast. Good one. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
08/12/2002 07:46:00 AM |
oh brother! What a stretch! |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
08/12/2002 06:55:00 AM |
Nice and elegant, shame it was done before. that's going to hunt you... unless it's you! |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
08/12/2002 06:41:00 AM |
NIce photo. Would a chronograph be a little more impressive? I think I might trt it, but I must say that I like this photo. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
08/12/2002 06:25:00 AM |
The shot is wonderful, but I'm "iffy" on whether or not it meets the challenge. It just doesn't convey "Something New" to me. lhall |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
08/12/2002 05:13:00 AM |
Good color and depth, but I don't see how it relates to the challenge subject. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
08/12/2002 12:06:00 AM |
I think this photo would have more of an impace if the time read midnight, but I like it a lot how it is. I'm going to give it a 9. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
08/11/2002 11:28:00 PM |
Am getting a little tired of the watch images at the challenges here. This, however, is a very clean, sharp shot. I like how you positioned the watch at an angle and the overall composition. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/05/2025 09:46:54 AM EDT.