Author | Thread |
Comments Made During the Challenge  |
|
10/21/2003 04:01:07 PM |
Very beautiful, even without the swan. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
10/21/2003 12:00:48 PM |
science ? a very unattractive picture of a swan far away. B&W makes it worse. sorry, can't see how it fits |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
10/19/2003 11:58:31 AM |
Nice picture, but if it weren't for the title, I wouldn't have even seen the swan. If it were possible to get closer, it would have been a little better. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
10/18/2003 07:23:53 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
10/18/2003 02:07:13 AM |
Science???????????????? Only if about 95% of anything is classed at such. Glad you mentioned it was a swan as well as I can't make it out. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
10/17/2003 11:13:10 PM |
I'm not sure if this is in the right challenge to be honest, the title makes me think its for the alone one. That said, its a nice black & white - unfortunately the size makes it difficult to determine details. The swan is very tiny and almost gets lost. If there is a larger version of this I'd love to see it. Lighting looks like it was good, subject has a nice dramatic air to it with the mist. I can't tell if those are bushes in the foreground or just strange reflection - either way its a tad distracting. Gave a 4, might have done better if the size was bigger, I couldn't see the science connection clearly either. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
10/17/2003 08:22:02 PM |
Science? Sorry, no matter how hard I try and see this I don't see anything remotely scientific going on other than that a camera was used to take it. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
10/17/2003 10:01:08 AM |
what does this have to do with science? nice shot though |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
10/16/2003 03:08:29 PM |
Id like it better without the swan...it's too small! |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
10/15/2003 03:58:41 PM |
I regret both the small size and the inclusion of the partial plants in the very foreground in this otherwise incredibly romantic image. I really don't know what it is doing in this particular challenge, although I am grateful for this unexpected change of pace. If it is chosen with ironic intend, the irony would be lovely. ;-)
This imperfect and memorable image has considerable beauty. > 7 |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
10/15/2003 11:18:49 AM |
nice shot, wouldn't able to tell that the subject was a swan if you didn't say so, & how do you relate this shot to science? Just curious. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
10/15/2003 08:33:41 AM |
Beautiful, but the science thing is a bit of a stretch. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
10/15/2003 08:06:18 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
10/15/2003 06:12:18 AM |
What the?? I don't see any science happening... |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
10/15/2003 03:56:42 AM |
Seems a bit of a stretch for a science topic, and I can hardly see the swan. The reflections are awesome - maybe would have been better as a larger image than 400x300. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
10/14/2003 09:03:46 PM |
doesnt really say science to me |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/07/2025 01:26:27 AM EDT.