| Author | Thread |
Comments Made During the Challenge  |
|
|
09/17/2006 07:37:24 PM |
| interesting and effective abstract take on this. made me stop and think what is that before I saw the tree! |
|
 Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
09/17/2006 03:53:18 PM |
| Nice and clever editing. Really brings out the detail in the bark. Great photo. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
09/16/2006 04:22:05 AM |
| I'm sorry but this is so awful - don't know what you were trying to achieve with the IR but it doesn't work here! |
|
|
|
09/14/2006 02:15:48 PM |
| Inverting has really hurt the image here. I think you're very brave though :) |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
09/14/2006 01:25:56 PM |
| Too hard to see that it is a tree... |
|
|
|
09/13/2006 03:56:14 AM |
| ? Im not sure what Im looking at? |
|
|
|
09/12/2006 11:07:32 PM |
slightly disorientated as it took me a moment to realise it's taken looking up, not down. using the negative trick made the dizziness moreso. i actually quite like the abstract nature of this, and strikes me as something quite creative. the only thing that lessens the abtract feel is that pesky leaf up the top, which looks far too conventional and normal. but i love how the rest of the leaves form a nicely random patterned background to the trunk. visually quite lovely.
new scoring systemâ„¢; composition + technical 2/3, challenge 1/1, post processing results 1.5/2, ooooh factor 2.5/3, originality 1/1 = 8 |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
09/12/2006 10:43:18 AM |
| Although interesting, this just doesn't work for me. |
|
|
|
09/12/2006 08:53:01 AM |
| I'm not sure the inversion really helps this shot. I'm curious as to what motivated you to choose it. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
09/12/2006 07:40:44 AM |
| The tree form takes on the shape of a body - almost - when inverted. INteresting effect. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
09/11/2006 05:06:47 PM |
| pp here detracts from what appears to be an interesting image...duotones/sepia may have worked better for me |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
09/11/2006 02:21:11 PM |
|
|
|
09/11/2006 12:11:39 PM |
| Initially I really don't like it, but it's very interesting and captivating the more you look at it. I like the bark, especially the whites. The main that's confusing to my eye is the composition. It's definetly abstract, but for me it's not pleasing. For me there's a balance between pros/cons,so a 5. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
09/11/2006 10:30:02 AM |
| I am not sure why you made this a negative photo. It's not that bad in its original form although the sky is overexposed. The negative image doesn't appeal to me. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
09/11/2006 09:37:32 AM |
| Ick - funny how reversing an image makes it so unappealing to the human brain (or maybe just my brain that likes things the-way-they-are-supposed-to-be). |
|
|
|
09/11/2006 08:30:06 AM |
| I like the inversion but the composition doesn't help me enjoy the subject....too much tree trunk, too little of the leaves which are the most interesting part of the image. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
09/11/2006 05:13:29 AM |
| Post processing used doesn't work for me. Just my opinion, sorry. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/07/2025 07:32:37 PM EDT.
Add photograph to your favorites
Add photographer to your favorites
