Hi from the critique Club Jimmy.
Er ... this is really a 10D photograph? what happened to the presence, the detail, the power of that camera? Why such a small edit? It seems grainy, over-sharpened, lacking in dynamic range ... rashed, perchance?
There is, evidently, some detail here - the rings on the mini-dials' faces are pretty clear, and there is some depth - viz the light on the edge of the sweep hand, but it's a struggle to find those things.
I don't know whether your problems lie in post-processing, RAW file processing, or what. Don't know what lens you used, and to be honest it would be beyond me to tell you what would be a good choice. One definite improvement would, I think, be to shoot at more of an angle - use the SLR's facility with depth of field more.
But still the submitted size and quality are a mystery given the camera ...
ed |