DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 
Challenge Entries
Portfolio Images
This image is not part of a public portfolio.
Architectural Rhythm
Architectural Rhythm
adjustabletool


Photograph Information Photographer's Comments
Challenge: Rhythm II (Basic Editing III)
Camera: Fujifilm FinePix A340 Zoom
Location: Gleneden Auckland NZ
Date: May 1, 2006
Aperture: f/5.6
ISO: 64
Shutter: 0.002 (1/500)
Galleries: Urban, Architecture
Date Uploaded: May 1, 2006

N/A

Statistics
Place: 181 out of 208
Avg (all users): 4.6667
Avg (commenters): 4.2000
Avg (participants): 4.7067
Avg (non-participants): 4.6471
Views since voting: 4732
Views during voting: 297
Votes: 228
Comments: 6
Favorites: 0


Please log in or register to add your comments!

AuthorThread
05/16/2006 04:49:14 PM
Hey there from the Critique Club

First off, always try to include some info about the shot in the Photographer's Comments section. It really helps out when we know what the photographer was thinking and what equipment/lighting/etc. were used, especially when you request a critique. Secondly, welcome to DPChallenge! You have some nice work in your challenges to date, and I look forward to seeing more.

Camera Work/Technical: The first thing that strikes me here is that your focus seems to be off. You did a pretty good job controlling your exposure in such harsh lighting. You lost just a little detail in the shadows, and even less in the bright areas. Nice depth of field usage to ensure everything in the subject area was near focused.

Lighting: This looks like a very harsh lighting condition. There are lots of shadows, as well as some very bright areas. You did a pretty good job with the exposure despite the lighting, but perhaps shooting this at a different time of day would have helped.

Composition/Content: You have chosen a nice, rhythmic pattern here, but it gets lost in the rest of the photograph elements. The parking lot, plants and pole are all distracting from the rhythm itself. I think a different point of view would have improved your score tremendously.

My Opinion: Your photo was scored appropriately as it is captured. With a bit different point of view and a different time of day, this one could have scored better. IT does meet the challenge well, but that is only one element that the voters look at when assigning scores.
  Photographer found comment helpful.
 Comments Made During the Challenge
05/09/2006 04:05:01 AM
Nice sharp colours, might be worth straightening the vertical lines as this makes the picture slightly awkward.
  Photographer found comment helpful.
05/08/2006 06:12:02 PM
At 1st glance it seems to be a bit out of focus. I would have liked a tighter crop on the pattern of the building, the totem pole the door on the side the plants they are all very distracting
  Photographer found comment helpful.
05/07/2006 07:28:32 PM
The pole in the center is distracting
  Photographer found comment helpful.
05/05/2006 02:37:32 AM
Kind of fuzzy
  Photographer found comment helpful.
05/05/2006 12:41:07 AM
Nice find
  Photographer found comment helpful.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/07/2025 01:24:16 PM EDT.