Author | Thread |
|
05/07/2006 06:53:57 AM |
~trading post~
Clever idea executed well.
I'd like to see more contrast, and not such a dark b/g - seems very blown-out in the original. This suggests lighting was not perfect.
I think it could have been improved had the dof been greater, so that the face (real face, not the printout) wasn't OOF.
All in all, I think the b/g could have been chosen better, but the idea was great, and title cool, and it scored well
|
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
05/04/2006 11:20:58 PM |
Clever idea well-executed. I like the clean/simple background (although I think the horizonal bar would look better if it were lower in the picture to use the rule of thirds and to have relatively more of the dark reflective background bureau (?) mirror that gives added punch and contrast). I love the blue tones generally, too. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
05/03/2006 05:43:04 PM |
Trading Post comment
I don't get why folks couldn't figure out how this was done without requesting validation, but take comfort in the knowledge it wasn't just yours - seems everyone who did something like this had "validated" on their entry. Extra point for the clever title and overall creativity.
I did the "invert" thing on this during the challenge voting and would have preferred it in more natural tones. I realize you probably did the saturation thing to give it more "spark", though. I suspect a less cluttered background might have helped a bit too. Overall, I like the concept behind the picture, and you pulled it off pretty well. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
05/03/2006 04:22:18 PM |
this is a very interesting image, the idea is godd, but you could play a little more with the setup to make the image pop.
those horizontal lines that are spliting the image are leaning a bit, that makes the image out of balance, and they could be a bit lower in the image, so that the top line would be where the bottom line is now, then the image would have the base at the rule of thirds and would make the image stronger.
another go would be to crop the image just above the eyebrow, then the mirror would be at the rule of thirds focal point, since the hair is too white to show any real details the image would benefit from it being cropped away.
and those small blue lines behind the mirror are really distracting, I know you couldn't do anything in basic editing, but you can now.
hope this helps you get on the right track to success :) |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
05/03/2006 01:32:35 PM |
hello,
i actually liked this photo a lot. i thought you did a great job. it is very deservant of the placement. maybe even a bit higher.
my only thought is, not that it matters, why is it blue? uncertain ifn a differing color would have been better.
overall a very well done image. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
05/03/2006 10:42:52 AM |
I wouldn't have thought to ask for validation, because it seems pretty clear how this was done. My opinion only of course, but this is more clever than creative, for me. There's little to be said compositionally, photographically, etc., apart, perhaps, from the fact that the inverted portions create interesting shapes throughout: the dark area, the bright area (maybe a bit too bright), the bluer area. I think you met the challenge well. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
05/03/2006 08:32:56 AM |
Trading Post...
Very creative. The really bright white of the hair seems to pop out at me first though. Once I get past that the image is sharp, nice composition. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
05/03/2006 08:32:14 AM |
[[Trading Post]]
In general, it looks like it served you pretty well. The image doesn't really appeal to me that much, but it is a clever technique, and I probably would have given you a 6 or 7. While I like blue skies, blue images just don't appeal to me for some reason, and there's a lot of blue here. Excellent idea, and well done. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
05/02/2006 09:41:45 PM |
--Trading Post Comment--
I am surprised that it didn't do better. This is definitely one of the most creative shots of the challenge. The composition is very nice and the lighting looks great for a negative image. The brightness of your hair is a bit overbearing, but not enough that I would have voted low. I didn't vote in this challenge, but this would have been in the 7 range for me. Nice work and awesome creativity. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Comments Made During the Challenge  |
|
05/02/2006 01:40:48 PM |
Very nice man! So you like your positive one. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
05/01/2006 10:38:19 PM |
Cute title, and the only disappointment was that I thought it was Tom Sellek when I viewed the thumbnail. Sigh... |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/30/2006 04:41:09 PM |
why isn't the face in the mirror negative? |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/29/2006 08:41:14 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/29/2006 08:37:56 AM |
Cool idea. I thought it was an editing trick until I saw the validation. Then it came clear to me how you would have done this. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/29/2006 04:59:43 AM |
This is a great idea...how did you do this without spot editing? |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/28/2006 08:53:18 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/28/2006 05:36:31 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/28/2006 04:23:51 PM |
I like the concept and the title. Good job. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/27/2006 08:37:46 PM |
Haha, I think I know how you did this. Clever idea, and well executed. I think it might have been cooler if it were a big mirror, to fill some of the empty background space. 8 |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/27/2006 06:15:27 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/27/2006 11:20:06 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/27/2006 04:00:47 AM |
how you did this...I am guessing you were pasted on as a negative, which became a positive...clever work my friend...you deserve to do well |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/26/2006 10:15:12 PM |
Very cool shot. Took me a minute, but very clever job with the title :-) |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/26/2006 07:21:45 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/26/2006 04:15:37 PM |
Georgeous. And a cool picture too. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/26/2006 02:28:30 PM |
Cool...how did you do that? |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/26/2006 10:55:16 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/26/2006 09:35:04 AM |
Very effective. And the title jst adds to the overall quality. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/26/2006 07:18:08 AM |
Great Idea! Nice shot. Did you use a negative print an the mirror? |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/26/2006 04:42:42 AM |
I'm fascinated as to how you achieved this - please do tell us after voting is over. Great effect, good comp. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/26/2006 01:48:36 AM |
nice trick, hope you glued a negative printout to the rorriM and didn't use spot editing... Background is a bit distracting. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/25/2006 08:59:04 PM |
smart! really stands out from the rest :) |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/05/2025 11:08:21 AM EDT.