| Author | Thread |
|
|
06/24/2003 07:44:01 PM |
*Critique Club*
When I saw this photo during voting I commented about the softness of the focus, and I would again say that the focus is an issue. The baby is right in the center of the photo and it would create a much nicer effect to have the baby off slightly to one side or the other and again try and work eye level with the child and not shooting down.
There is a harshness on the righthand side at the bottom which is definately a lighting issue that can most often be corrected only by the time of day when shooting outside.
My one suggestion that is very easily fixed is for you to try to submit larger photos, even if you have cropped them down enlarge them to closer to the 640 deminision, it does help.
As for meeting the challenge yes it does this little boy is so cute and the colors are so well coordinated with the yellow slide and the yellow within his shortalls. He definately is a cutie. Welcome to DPChallenge and if you need any help just ask, and don't be afraid of the forum, a lot of questions get answered there.
Best of Luck in future challenges and so you know you scored very well for your first challenge.
Anna |
|
|
|
06/20/2003 07:14:10 AM |
| Now I see. I was wondering whta the background was. He is very cute. |
|
Comments Made During the Challenge  |
|
|
06/17/2003 02:07:49 PM |
| i like the chubby arms, but the right side seems blown out. Also, its easier for voters to see pictures that are submitted larger. :) |
|
|
|
06/15/2003 02:39:48 PM |
| Very cute, and a cool background. The expression looks a little worried, though. |
|
|
|
06/14/2003 10:16:49 PM |
| its a pity youv'e submitted such a small image a larger one would have shown more detail in the childst expression |
|
|
|
06/12/2003 03:42:45 AM |
| nice colors, but lower right part of the image is over exposed and some parts of forhead. = 3 |
|
|
|
06/11/2003 05:08:07 PM |
I don't really have any problem picturing a Parents Magazine cover featuring a baby, but generally don't they go with less cranky-looking ones? Why is this image so much smaller than max dimensions; was it a huge crop?
The lighting on this is probably too focussed on the bottom/right.
Aside from the weirdly small crop, the dimensions seem about right for the magazine. They generally go with a neutral background anyhow so it probably wouldn't have mattered much. |
|
|
|
06/11/2003 02:29:44 PM |
| This is cute... I would have liked to have seen it bigger though. There is almost too much light on this photo coming in from the bottom left... and the baby is looking at you like... what are you doing! I'm guessing thats some kind of a slide? I could definitely see a form of this photo as the front cover... it's cute. |
|
 Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
06/11/2003 02:24:11 AM |
I wish the baby would have been a little more too one side.
This would allow for sub-topics titles. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
06/10/2003 10:18:23 PM |
| The shot is a little too small for rating... Im afraid. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
06/10/2003 08:31:39 PM |
| This is very soft on the focus an unsharpening mask may have helped. Also when taking baby photos get down on the same level as them don't take the photo looking down at them. The camera was obviously higher than the babies face. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/09/2025 07:34:54 PM EDT.
Add photograph to your favorites
Add photographer to your favorites
