| Author | Thread |
|
|
06/18/2003 08:31:08 PM |
|
Comments Made During the Challenge  |
|
|
06/17/2003 03:52:25 PM |
| The shadows and lighting are well done... |
|
 Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
06/16/2003 06:37:08 PM |
| Technically the image is very nice, but the idea of the challenge was to photograph a subject as if it were going to be the cover of a magazine. In my opinion this does not meet the requirements of the challenge. However, I am giving you a 5 based on the good quality of this image. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
06/16/2003 04:53:08 PM |
| like an anniversary issue? I like the interesting composition and lighting, its simple, but has impact. Should have arranged it to be in portrait presentation. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
06/16/2003 03:18:24 PM |
| I think your lighting is great - but I'm not sure this meets the challenge. |
|
|
|
06/16/2003 01:33:35 PM |
| I think the point is to take a photo that can be part of a magazine, this is just a bunch of magazine covers, clearly missing the mark. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
06/15/2003 08:41:38 PM |
| Not much originality here. National Geographic on National Geographic. |
|
|
|
06/15/2003 09:01:34 AM |
| Not sure this is within the intent of the contest...taking someone else's image for an entry. |
|
|
|
06/15/2003 08:20:09 AM |
| Interesting, but I don't think National Geographic would have.. eh.. National Geographic on the cover. |
|
|
|
06/14/2003 03:06:19 PM |
| Interesting idea, if you could find a more creative way of presenting the magazines, the image would be alot stronger. I like the lighting though! |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
06/14/2003 01:26:14 PM |
| I don't think NG would use this picture on their cover; just take a look at their magazine. Therefore I don't think that you really meet the challenge. |
|
|
|
06/14/2003 12:06:05 PM |
| I'm not sure this was quite the intent of the challenge. Then again, I suppose I could see something like this on a yearly review maybe. I do like the lighting, though, the shaft of light highlighting the magazines almost feels like reading them is a guilty pleasure and someone has opened a door into a dark room where the view is trying to read them. |
|
|
|
06/13/2003 02:25:47 PM |
This is definately a magazine cover, but I think the point of the challenge was to make your own, not take a pic of one that is already made.
That being said, your focus is way too soft to portray this magazine properly. I can't even read half the stuff printed on this cover. I also don't care for the harsh shadows under the magazines. Subject is too centered, and just doesn't draw my interest. |
|
|
|
06/12/2003 09:38:38 AM |
| This is a nice capture of magazines, but I do not think it meets the intentions the challenge subject. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
06/12/2003 07:55:43 AM |
| Is this a photo of a mock-up of a cover that you've created using your own photo of a leopard or just a photo of a pile of real issues? |
|
|
|
06/11/2003 08:31:15 PM |
| the idea wasn't to take a picture of a magazine itself. |
|
|
|
06/11/2003 08:03:24 PM |
| Does National Geographic show their own magazines on their cover? The use of sunlight and shadow on the floor frames the photo really nicely, though - attractive. |
|
|
|
06/11/2003 02:02:41 PM |
| I'm not sure this is what the challenge mean by Magazine cover. I do like the lighting though and think it's a good picture in it's own right. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
06/11/2003 12:14:42 PM |
| Personally I do not consider magazines to be in a horizontal shape... thats just me though. This does not fit the challenge in any way shape or form. I didn't see the challenge saying take a photo OF your favorite magazine, I believe it was to take a photo that could be the front cover of your magazine, I'm not sure NG would ever put a photo of a bunch of their magazines on their magazine. Sorry bout that, but it just doesn't fit. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
06/11/2003 11:28:21 AM |
Lovely photo, but I think you missed the challenge idea - Make your OWN mag cover, not shoot somebody else's (this is other people's art - site rules and all)
4 Rob the Swash |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
06/11/2003 08:51:20 AM |
| This is a really nice, well-composed and creatively lit shot. I'm not sure that the challenge meant to actually take a photograph *of* a magazine cover, though... I'll give it a 6 for a technically good shot, however. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
06/11/2003 08:34:09 AM |
| A picture of a magazine that is the same in your title won't probably work here. |
|
|
|
06/11/2003 08:19:38 AM |
| I imagine we are going to see a lot of National Geographic shots. I would like to have seen a photo of flora/fauna/people like the magazine has rather than a shot of the magazine. Good attempt. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
06/11/2003 07:48:09 AM |
| This is one the photos that adjusts better to the rules of the challenge, and of course a very good photo. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
06/11/2003 06:14:54 AM |
| This seems to miss the point of the challenge, but maybe this cover was for a special issue selling older issues! 4 Jak |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/07/2025 07:08:25 PM EDT.
Add photograph to your favorites
Add photographer to your favorites
