Author | Thread |
Comments Made During the Challenge  |
|
04/19/2005 04:52:44 PM |
I like the wide angle but I am not too big on the fish eye look. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/19/2005 03:35:52 PM |
The second really wide shot Ive seen, its effective, I need me one these lenses,, great sky-- just all-aorund a nice photo, 8 |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/19/2005 07:34:19 AM |
nice contrast..building does not look too abandoned. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/18/2005 07:48:15 AM |
interesting pix. use of fish eye ok, but towers bowing kind of distracting. blacks good, whites need work. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/17/2005 09:54:45 PM |
Doesn't scream abandoned, but will assume that it is.
The curvature is a bit of an uneasy feeling for me on this one.
Good tone used. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/17/2005 07:47:04 PM |
Looks beautiful, but it doesn't look abandoned to me. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/17/2005 06:45:05 PM |
i really like everything about this picture except the fact that it was taken with a fisheye/wideangle lens. the fisheye effect doesn't seem fitting to me for this type of picture. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/17/2005 06:12:56 PM |
I doesn't appear to be abandoned, not saying that it's not. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/17/2005 04:35:22 AM |
Good contrast but I'm a little distracted by the wide angle effect. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/16/2005 05:32:39 PM |
Very nice contrast, but I'm personally not fond of the curvature. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/16/2005 03:15:10 PM |
I'm sorry, but this just doesn't look abandoned - what a beautiful structure! :-/ |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/16/2005 11:13:35 AM |
Very dramatic, but don't care for the curvature and most importantly - it may be abandoned, but it sure does not appear to be. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/15/2005 10:51:25 PM |
I don't personally like the fisheye effect in this. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/15/2005 06:55:56 PM |
I don't think the fisheye works well for this. I like the building though and you did a good job balancing the light trim with the darker brick. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/15/2005 02:17:30 PM |
Very nice photograph in b&w. Like the unusual perspective. Excellent focus. This building looks like it just too new, to be called abandoned. You did too good a job with this photograph for me to visualize it as abandoned. Perhaps a little closer shot of the windows, if they boarded up. Great photogrpah! |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/14/2005 11:57:54 AM |
The look of this building seems too splendid to be abandoned, nice photo nevertheless.... |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/14/2005 10:27:14 AM |
cool tones in this image, doesn't look too abandoned tho its a beautiful structure |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/14/2005 07:38:46 AM |
Nice choice w/ the fisheye |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/14/2005 03:38:31 AM |
it doesn't look abandoned, and i don't like the eye fish look... |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/13/2005 10:55:50 PM |
dont know about the fisheye here |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/13/2005 07:21:03 PM |
don't care for the fish eye and the church doesn't look abandoned.. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/13/2005 06:19:15 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/13/2005 04:05:46 PM |
nice pic - like the fish eye effect, But abandoned? Not portrayed in the image, |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/13/2005 02:29:43 PM |
Interesting church. I'm not sure if I like the round effect to this picture. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/13/2005 02:00:16 PM |
Gasp! Is that beautiful building abandoned????? Who would leave such an architectural masterpiece abandoned. Your picture is just gorgeous! I LOVE the cepia tones!!! |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/13/2005 10:21:07 AM |
I like the subject of the picture, but the distortion is just too much for me. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/13/2005 09:13:29 AM |
Very moody pic. Good clarity of detail. Like the contrast. Fisheye lens? |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/13/2005 07:43:34 AM |
Great shot. Good luck. 7. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/13/2005 06:44:15 AM |
I don't know if you used a fish eye on this or it was just your lens you can correct this with transform perspective in photoshop if that was not the case. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/13/2005 06:44:12 AM |
Nice picture, but it doesn't look very abandoned - is it really? |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/13/2005 03:11:09 AM |
I like how you printed this image although I think is a tiny bit dark. The distortion of the building works against the image. (opinion) |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/12/2005 09:58:48 PM |
A beautiful building, nice shot and you certainly get a plus for using a fisheye lens! |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/12/2005 09:23:33 PM |
This is a very nice shot, but I am sorry, nothing about it says 'abandoned' to me -- looks in better shape than most active churches around here. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/12/2005 08:26:07 PM |
Nice WA effect here -- def works with the towers! |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/12/2005 08:24:12 PM |
I have a hard time believing this is abandoned from this shot |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/07/2025 02:51:28 AM EDT.