| Author | Thread |
Comments Made During the Challenge  |
|
|
02/07/2005 02:06:02 PM |
|
|
|
02/07/2005 10:47:50 AM |
|
|
|
02/07/2005 01:26:42 AM |
| dramatic, but I assume the blur was done in post. is that allowed? |
|
|
|
02/06/2005 10:35:16 AM |
| THe blur works in well, just those two white specks don't fit in! |
|
|
|
02/05/2005 07:34:28 PM |
| Was there a little camera shake until / after your flash fired? I can't decide if the movement is distracting or helps add focus to the sign. Maybe softer or more consistant bidirrectional movement would clear it up a little |
|
|
|
02/04/2005 10:57:17 PM |
| The sign really stands out here. Nice work. |
|
|
|
02/04/2005 09:54:44 AM |
Challenge: 6
Compsition: 5 Maybe another angle would have given it a better feel.
Technical: 7 I like the bokeh effect and the halo outline of the sign.
Appeal: 6 Just not giving me the wow that I want.
Overall: 6 |
|
|
|
02/03/2005 12:02:06 AM |
| Good strong use of the colours, but photo is weakened too much by the blurry background. Tripod is essential for a photo like this. |
|
|
|
02/02/2005 01:01:45 PM |
| Bit to blurred for me. Would have worked with an nice sharp sign. |
|
|
|
02/02/2005 03:57:29 AM |
| I would have taken out the semi-circles of light. 7 |
|
|
|
02/02/2005 12:10:24 AM |
| Long exposure and flash? Nice effect (if it was intentional!) but i find the two lights towards the left distracting |
|
|
|
02/01/2005 11:59:33 PM |
| Really nice as far as I'm concerned, probably doomed to perdition by the blur police. |
|
|
|
02/01/2005 08:03:21 PM |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/08/2025 01:45:23 AM EDT.
Add photograph to your favorites
Add photographer to your favorites
