| Author | Thread |
|
|
02/07/2005 06:41:58 AM |
Thanks to everyone for their comments. Just got this camera and have never entered anything before so I suppose this was a way to get the feet wet. Doesn't help that I don't have access to Photoshop yet which is why I had trouble with sizing. Anyway, hopefully I can tweak the rudimentary stuff and submit more meaningful shots in the future.
Originally posted by Britannica:
The points that I am sure you have heard already in the comments; image size is not using the allowed size of 640 pixels on a side and has a bit of a clockwise tilt. The motion blur is so obvious I will assume it was intentional, and it certainly brings the focus of the image away from the building (as a building) and places it squarely on the lights. A great way to meet the challenge topic head on. However, abstracting the building in this way leaves you with composition only to produce an effect -- and it is a bit heavy on the right hand side. The large bright area in the lower right out weights the rest of the image -- I believe placing more negative space on the right and less on the left would have produced a better composed image. |
|
|
Comments Made During the Challenge  |
|
|
02/05/2005 11:54:20 AM |
| The points that I am sure you have heard already in the comments; image size is not using the allowed size of 640 pixels on a side and has a bit of a clockwise tilt. The motion blur is so obvious I will assume it was intentional, and it certainly brings the focus of the image away from the building (as a building) and places it squarely on the lights. A great way to meet the challenge topic head on. However, abstracting the building in this way leaves you with composition only to produce an effect -- and it is a bit heavy on the right hand side. The large bright area in the lower right out weights the rest of the image -- I believe placing more negative space on the right and less on the left would have produced a better composed image. |
|
 Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
02/05/2005 07:12:43 AM |
| It's too small, also no part is clearly in focus. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
02/03/2005 09:58:01 AM |
| Seems too blurry, the crop isn't straight, would like to see more of the building. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
02/02/2005 01:21:02 AM |
| Sorry the photo is very small and blured with funny squiggly things. I would suggest you look in the tutorial section for re sizing photos for a challenge. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
02/01/2005 10:41:27 AM |
| Sorry, this does not work for me. Too small and the motion during exposure is more distracting than interesting. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/30/2005 10:09:14 PM |
Oh dear, this is WAY too small and will get marked down severely for that reason.
The photo itself is puzzling. What is it? It just looks like a blur. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/07/2025 07:42:09 PM EDT.
Add photograph to your favorites
Add photographer to your favorites
