Holga/Lomo April SC - The Images

Pentax DA 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 AF

04/15/2010 04:51:31 AM · #52

paynekj

Pentax K10D

04/15/2010 07:57:52 AM · #53

Message edited by author 2010-04-15 11:59:32.

krnodil

Canon EOS-5D Mark II

Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM

04/15/2010 04:11:33 PM · #54

actually two different pictures - second one used a blue gel on the lens

Message edited by author 2010-04-15 22:01:28.

Pentax DA 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 AF

04/16/2010 05:34:46 AM · #55

Ran a roll of color through the half-frame binocular camera. I'm really liking this cheapo camera.

Message edited by author 2010-04-16 09:35:21.

paynekj

Pentax K10D

04/16/2010 07:12:00 AM · #56

04/16/2010 10:16:39 PM · #57

Message edited by author 2010-04-17 02:22:54.

04/18/2010 06:51:42 PM · #58

Here are three from a roll today. Kev clowning around for me in the second two.
Bergger BRF 100. Tried Rodinal at 1-100, no agitation for 1 hour... Seems to add a bit of a fog.

Message edited by author 2010-04-18 22:54:01.

04/19/2010 05:46:05 AM · #59

04/19/2010 07:10:14 AM · #60

well, I'm a bit miffed. I was hoping the roll of film I sent to the lab last week would have been back this evening when I came home from work. Nope. So another day without anything to post. Blah. Still I have 3 rolls at the lab, so at least maybe by next week....

04/20/2010 05:03:59 AM · #61

04/20/2010 06:00:05 PM · #62

Trying a roll of Infrared film. Almost every shot was ...way... underexposed. Thank goodness the film only costs about ten bucks a roll! :-(

04/20/2010 06:39:10 PM · #63

Another try...

bvy

Sigma DP1x

04/20/2010 06:58:09 PM · #64

Need to catch on commenting (me, that is, not all of you).

04/20/2010 07:34:29 PM · #65

And still my films are not back from the lab.

04/21/2010 05:31:40 AM · #66

Another shot of the restored Sinclair station, taken with my 69 cent backwards camera.

04/21/2010 06:01:18 AM · #67

Originally posted by salmiakki:

And still my films are not back from the lab.

It is sooo cheap and easy to do yourself! And for me, another opportunity to procrastinate...

04/21/2010 07:14:46 AM · #68

Originally posted by tph1:

It is sooo cheap and easy to do yourself! And for me, another opportunity to procrastinate...

In theory I agree with you. However, I haven't got time at the moment to learn something new, I'm somewhat preoccupied with other things, so I'd never get the stuff processed.

04/22/2010 04:54:36 AM · #69

I must admit, to a large extent I am disappointed in the good images I am getting from this 69 cent backwards camera. No interesting lens aberrations, light leaks, or vignetting. Just the moderately soft images you would expect from something cheap.

Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM

04/22/2010 05:26:54 AM · #70

Originally posted by Yo_Spiff:

That made me laugh. It's so round the wrong way somehow. You are getting pretty good value for your money though out of that camera.

krnodil

Canon EOS-5D Mark II

04/22/2010 05:32:34 AM · #71

Originally posted by Yo_Spiff:

see if you can't flip the lens... :)

04/22/2010 08:15:53 AM · #72

FINALLY got one roll of film back. So I'm back in business :)

OK, quick question. Are you all just scanning exactly as is or making any adjustments (eg contrast)? I have a few that could use a contrast boost.

Message edited by author 2010-04-22 12:49:39.

04/22/2010 09:36:08 AM · #73

Originally posted by salmiakki:

In my case, I am having to make some adjustments... a few have taken just a little contrast. A couple much more than that!

04/22/2010 09:52:17 AM · #74

This is addictive, isn't it? A handful, hot off the scanner. Got to make up for lost time :) Need to practice with the scanner, I definitely do not have the hang of that right now. All with my Holga

.

The whole dust thing on your sensor starts to fade into insignificance when comparing to the dust when scanning! Yikes.

Message edited by author 2010-04-22 14:28:35.