| Author | Thread |
|
|
11/23/2008 10:29:40 AM · #1 |
Everyone's favorite Senor Rockwell has that on his page. Is there any validity to it, or is he making shit up again?
And will it make the D3 drop in price? :o |
|
|
|
11/23/2008 11:02:24 AM · #2 |
Keepin' up with the Jones'
|
|
|
|
11/23/2008 11:08:34 AM · #3 |
Rockwell only reads dpreview fora.
Try to find a discussion between software writers for RAW conversions. They were very cryptically discussing RAW conversion without demosaicing, aka no Bayer sensor in this or a future generation.
]
|
|
|
|
11/23/2008 02:31:28 PM · #4 |
| It is probably true because I just purchased my D3 and every time I break down and buy something expensive they always come out with a newer better version. Never Fails!!! |
|
|
|
11/23/2008 05:47:21 PM · #5 |
| a quick google search on Nikon D3x shows a lot of rumors being posted besides Rockwell's. One even suggests they will cut loose the d3x moniker and call it a D4. |
|
|
|
11/24/2008 08:52:19 AM · #6 |
For more Nikon rumors:
link
The D3x should be release soon! |
|
|
|
11/24/2008 09:33:05 AM · #7 |
Originally posted by Bugzeye:
It is probably true because I just purchased my D3 and every time I break down and buy something expensive they always come out with a newer better version. Never Fails!!! |
You too? If I had just held off on my D300 I could have gone with the D700 and gotten a full frame?!?!!!! I don't know if I could have waited that long but had I known I would have waited for sure. |
|
|
|
11/24/2008 09:43:58 AM · #8 |
| the admin is saying the price will be over $8,000. Nikon always releases pro cameras for around 5,500. I agree with Ken Rockwell - the price drop of the d3 leaves a $5,500 slot for the d3x. And i'm watching nikon carefully - the d700 almost convinced me to go nikon, but i got myself on my school's waiting list for the 5d mark ii instead. |
|
|
|
11/24/2008 09:47:49 AM · #9 |
Originally posted by Azrifel:
Rockwell only reads dpreview fora.
Try to find a discussion between software writers for RAW conversions. They were very cryptically discussing RAW conversion without demosaicing, aka no Bayer sensor in this or a future generation.
] |
I doubt either canon or nikon are going foveon anytime soon... part of their new processing systems is greater demosaic-ing (sp?) accuracy. i think theyll stick with bayer filters for now and maybe use foveon sensors next time theres a processor update |
|
|
|
11/24/2008 10:39:49 AM · #10 |
Originally posted by robshookphoto:
Originally posted by Azrifel:
Rockwell only reads dpreview fora.
Try to find a discussion between software writers for RAW conversions. They were very cryptically discussing RAW conversion without demosaicing, aka no Bayer sensor in this or a future generation.
] |
I doubt either canon or nikon are going foveon anytime soon... part of their new processing systems is greater demosaic-ing (sp?) accuracy. i think theyll stick with bayer filters for now and maybe use foveon sensors next time theres a processor update |
This is not about Foveon sensors.
Fuji, Canon and Nikon all have unique patents for multi-color capture on one photosite.
|
|
|
|
11/24/2008 11:49:09 AM · #11 |
| oh, i didnt know others existed. i guess that makes sense - theres no reason canon would stop making sensors for their own cameras now after such success in the dslr category of cameras |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/06/2025 07:12:53 PM EDT.
