| Author | Thread |
|
|
09/13/2005 10:35:25 AM · #1 |
please help!
Message edited by scalvert - Image removed- for now.. |
|
|
|
09/13/2005 10:38:28 AM · #2 |
| Please don't post potential or current entries until the voting is over. |
|
|
|
09/13/2005 10:43:15 AM · #3 |
for anymore wondering - this was meant to be a humorous take on
this thread
Message edited by author 2005-09-13 14:43:40. |
|
|
|
09/13/2005 10:49:20 AM · #4 |
thought i'd post it again so people dont open a thread to find nothing
Oh, and to be PC: (though it still wont be illegal if didnt state this): Obviously I have no intention of entering it or anything like it. |
|
|
|
09/13/2005 10:52:35 AM · #5 |
Originally posted by vfwlkr:
thought i'd post it again so people dont open a thread to find nothing
|
Dangit!!!! I had taken that exact same photo. Back to the drawing board! Curses vfwlkr!!! |
|
|
|
09/13/2005 10:57:24 AM · #6 |
I'd give it a 6, but I have a gentler scale than most folks...
4 = DNMC
5 = Crap
6 = OK
7 = Nice
8 = Really nice
9 = Really, really nice
10 = Really, really nice
|
|
|
|
09/13/2005 10:58:54 AM · #7 |
| so If I added the rake - it gets a 10? |
|
|
|
09/13/2005 10:59:33 AM · #8 |
Originally posted by Strikeslip:
I'd give it a 6, but I have a gentler scale than most folks...
4 = DNMC
5 = Crap
6 = OK
7 = Nice
8 = Really nice
9 = Really, really nice
10 = Really, really nice |
I don't understand how you differenciate between "Really, really nice" and "Really, really nice" to give them a 9 or a 10 |
|
|
|
09/13/2005 10:59:51 AM · #9 |
Originally posted by vfwlkr:
thought i'd post it again so people dont open a thread to find nothing
Oh, and to be PC: (though it still wont be illegal if didnt state this): Obviously I have no intention of entering it or anything like it. |
Left you a comment.
|
|
|
|
09/13/2005 11:05:49 AM · #10 |
I'm wondering if people looking at it are even reading the description :O
|
|
|
|
09/13/2005 11:23:14 AM · #11 |
| The image will probably be in the higher 4 and low 5 since there's no real impact. |
|
|
|
09/13/2005 11:24:30 AM · #12 |
Needs a sledgehammer? ;^)
Originally posted by rikki11:
The image will probably be in the higher 4 and low 5 since there's no real impact. |
|
|
|
|
09/13/2005 11:39:14 AM · #13 |
Originally posted by rikki11:
The image will probably be in the higher 4 and low 5 since there's no real impact. |
Aw chit!! I really had high hopes with this one.. damn voters! nobody likes my art! If I neatimaged and sharpened the heck out of it like everyone else, it would do well. I'm leaving!
Before I go - I should thank the SC for letting me post here.. now that I know it wont do well, I wont enter it.
|
|
|
|
09/13/2005 11:49:46 AM · #14 |
.
Message edited by author 2005-09-23 18:32:04.
|
|
|
|
09/13/2005 11:51:49 AM · #15 |
I would have given you a 1 cause you posted it in this thread. I would have stated I knew it was your picture too.
|
|
|
|
09/13/2005 12:02:20 PM · #16 |
Originally posted by vfwlkr:
...now that I know it wont do well, I wont enter it. |
Seeing it here, I'd give it an 9 just so you know it'll score well... then when you actually enter it, I'll smack it down with a 1. Muhuhahaha! ;-P
If the scores people claimed they'd give a photo in the forums were true, we'd have a LOT more entries scoring over 8.
Message edited by author 2005-09-13 16:08:03. |
|
|
|
09/13/2005 12:43:13 PM · #17 |
I wish I could of taken this during the submission dates but it was taken a couple weeks early and I had to clone a small tree. So I couldn't use it.
How do you think it would of done? As far as perspective..
 |
|
|
|
09/13/2005 12:44:21 PM · #18 |
Originally posted by SDW65:
I wish I could of taken this during the submission dates but it was taken a couple weeks early and I had to clone a small tree. So I couldn't use it.
How do you think it would of done? As far as perspective..
|
I'd give it a 12 if possible. But I say that about ALL the images :-) Or do I? I forget...
R.
|
|
|
|
09/13/2005 12:47:02 PM · #19 |
What's all this 'Rake' business that I've noticed being bandied about in the odd thread here and there?
:-? |
|
|
|
09/13/2005 12:49:53 PM · #20 |
Originally posted by Caine:
What's all this 'Rake' business that I've noticed being bandied about in the odd thread here and there?
:-? |
sshhhh that's our little dpc-secret. You will only know once you start spending 6hrs a day on this site |
|
|
|
09/13/2005 01:50:35 PM · #21 |
Originally posted by gaurawa:
Originally posted by Caine:
What's all this 'Rake' business that I've noticed being bandied about in the odd thread here and there?
:-? |
sshhhh that's our little dpc-secret. You will only know once you start spending 6hrs a day on this site |
Ah yes...Rakes and Wedding Photographers...
Maybe we can make it into a movie...
|
|
|
|
09/15/2005 05:45:32 AM · #22 |
Well if you don't feel like filling me in then I'll have to make my own impression of what's going on. I guess Rake is, or was, a member on the site then, yes? no?
Somehow I'm getting the feeling that someone made an established member on the site upset maybe, and the rest of the clique hopped on the bandwagon and have been bullying them since.
I could be miles off, but that's how it seems to a newbie. Maybe now I'll find out since folks generally don't like to be thought of as bullies. ;) |
|
|
|
09/15/2005 05:51:01 AM · #23 |
Originally posted by Caine:
Maybe now I'll find out since folks generally don't like to be thought of as bullies. ;) |
typically, that information is only made to paid members... |
|
|
|
09/15/2005 05:54:34 AM · #24 |
Originally posted by Strikeslip:
I'd give it a 6, but I have a gentler scale than most folks...
4 = DNMC
5 = Crap
6 = OK
7 = Nice
8 = Really nice
9 = Really, really nice
10 = Really, really nice |
OUCH! I have trouble getting to and staying in the crap range! |
|
|
|
09/15/2005 05:56:46 AM · #25 |
another perspective to look at (in no relation to my entry)
from last summer
a bit over compressed (as i ripped it from my home site rather than recreating for our discerning viewers ..
and don't mind the croping as it had to be straightened ....... |
|
