| Author | Thread |
|
|
02/09/2005 08:06:27 AM · #1 |
$630 The price is for the body only. No lens included. 3 year EXTENDTED WARRANY!!! I will throw in a HIGH end CAMERA BAG as well! Like new in the box! I PAID $850 from B&H Photo in Spetember 04!!! Try it before you buy it! I'm sure you'll be impressed.Everything about the camera is perfect. Absoutly nothing wrong with it! Never dropped, never in the sand/dust, LCD screen was (and still is) always covered with transparent screen protector. Comes with all items included in Original Canon Usa Factory box: battery, battery charger, cables, softwares, neck strap. email RACHELLE rmapostol@comcast.net
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lens for sale!
$700(MACRO)Canon Telephoto MP-E 65mm f/2.8 1-5x Manual Focus Lens for EOS USA Bought from B&H 4 months ago! I have used it TWICE! This is what I paid!!!
//www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=productlist&A=details&Q=&sku=183199&is=USA
email rmapostol@comcast.net
Message edited by author 2005-02-10 04:23:06. |
|
|
|
02/09/2005 08:30:13 AM · #2 |
When you are posting, if you click the link that says "automatically parse URLs," they will be clickable for other people. |
|
|
|
02/09/2005 08:31:36 AM · #3 |
|
|
|
02/09/2005 03:02:01 PM · #4 |
Originally posted by Haydens Mommy:
thank you! |
I sent you a PM about the MP. Could be interested.
Just curious, but what is it about the 75-300 you don't like and how could the 100-400 be very much of an improvement other then the IS? Both lenses are variable aperture wide ranging zooms with all the problems inherent with lenses possesing those features.
|
|
|
|
02/09/2005 03:06:15 PM · #5 |
I bought that 75-300 IS USM last weekend...wish I had known because I could have saved $200 buying yours! Such is life...
BTW...I love that lens. I hope I don't become disenchanted with it as you have. What did you find is wrong with it that makes you need to upgrade?
|
|
|
|
02/09/2005 03:07:36 PM · #6 |
Originally posted by nsbca7:
Originally posted by Haydens Mommy:
thank you! |
...Just curious, but what is it about the 75-300 you don't like and how could the 100-400 be very much of an improvement other then the IS? Both lenses are variable aperture wide ranging zooms with all the problems inherent with lenses possesing those features. |
The 100-400 is definitely quite superior optically to the 75-300. I must admit I've owned neither but opinion seems to be pretty clear-cut. The 100-400 has excellent performance for a "slow zoom", whereas the 75-300 is somewhat underwhelming, especially at the long end (>200mm).
Message edited by author 2005-02-09 20:09:18.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/19/2025 06:22:06 AM EDT.
