Author | Thread |
|
03/22/2002 10:35:47 AM · #1 |
"Night shots", what am I doing trespassing around at night? I was in the local mall parking lot the other night taking pictures when security approached me and told me to quit taking pictures. I asked why and she said that camera, video cameras, and such were not permitted without written permission. I live in California and I thought the law was that any pictures taken outside of an establishment or public place was all right? Do we have anybody out there that knows the law? |
|
|
03/22/2002 11:11:11 AM · #2 |
The trick is DONT GET CAUGHT. Then the laws don't apply. :) |
|
|
03/22/2002 11:24:11 AM · #3 |
Maybe you better check with Washington. I think there has been a total recall of any rights that we had before 9/11. |
|
|
03/22/2002 01:29:01 PM · #4 |
I took my picture in a place where no one should mind. I still had a couple drive by me and almost stop until they saw I was just taking pictures. I guess in this day and time, everyone is a lot more cautious. I can certainly understand there is a need for it.
Oh, and my sincerest thanks to mikeys_bistro for the camera advice. For the first time I had some really nice night shots. |
|
|
03/22/2002 02:41:25 PM · #5 |
I also feel creepy stalking around at night with my camera. I'm sure the residents of my location didn't mind but someone watching would have thought it pretty strange. |
|
|
03/22/2002 04:36:00 PM · #6 |
I thought about may calling up the local airport to see what times their flights come in so I could get night shots of aeroplanes, but I thought that the people would think I was a terrorist so if I'm gonna get the shot I guess Ill just have to be snoopy about it. |
|
|
03/22/2002 04:41:41 PM · #7 |
Maybe you could stand somewhere outside the airport. I have had planes take off right above me on the interstate outside of the Atlanta and Birmingham airports. I always thought those would make some great pictures. |
|
|
03/22/2002 05:31:42 PM · #8 |
The law is: for publication (and this site counts) you must get a property release (very much like a model release for a person.)
The practicality is no one will care unless there is controversy. If the property has a rent-a-cop who catches you while he is on his work break chances are he will ask you to move on. |
|
|
03/25/2002 09:21:42 PM · #9 |
waaahaaa, I missed the deadline by a day. oh well, this is what I would have entered: |
|
|
03/26/2002 12:03:16 AM · #10 |
Originally posted by jgibson: waaahaaa, I missed the deadline by a day. oh well, this is what I would have entered:
Damn, I think you just successfully tied the last 3 challenges into 1 photograph. Good job, though it is pretty blurry.
|
|
|
03/26/2002 12:20:50 AM · #11 |
Tilt your head back a little please. |
|
|
03/26/2002 12:42:46 AM · #12 |
Yeah, we need to see those nose hairs for it to be perfect. |
|
|
03/26/2002 04:28:18 AM · #13 |
haha yea, my camera doesn't do a good job focusing when there's very little light. The version up from it, the 707 apparently shoots lasers out so it can focus well in no light. I took two others in the same style, one was in good focus, and the other was much more out of focus, and I don't think it really detracts from the image having it only part way clear, since it kinda lends to the spookiness. |
|
|
03/26/2002 06:04:17 AM · #14 |
Yeah, I agree. Now take that picture again standing in front of a building and you have an architecture submission that also has the last 3 challenges included. |
|
|
03/26/2002 07:15:12 AM · #15 |
haha that'd be great. i could add each challenge to the picture. as long as we don't have any underwater shots, i think i'll be fine |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/08/2025 10:13:53 AM EDT.