| Author | Thread |
|
|
10/18/2011 08:22:55 PM · #1 |
| Thought I would start this one off.....post them, if you got them. |
|
|
|
10/18/2011 08:29:13 PM · #2 |
| First vote was a '2'! Here we go again....Some great shots and some snapshots! Should be interesting! |
|
|
|
10/18/2011 08:33:42 PM · #3 |
Votes: 4
Views: 13
Avg Vote: 3.2500
Early votes have a brown aura about them. |
|
|
|
10/18/2011 08:34:59 PM · #4 |
Votes: 4
Views: 14
Avg Vote: 5.2500
Comments: 0 |
|
|
|
10/18/2011 08:50:58 PM · #5 |
Votes: 5
Views: 16
Avg Vote: 5.6000
Comments: 0
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 10/19/11 12:50 am
|
|
|
|
10/18/2011 09:21:51 PM · #6 |
Not a shabby start
Votes: 6
Views: 19
Avg Vote: 5.8333
Comments: 0 |
|
|
|
10/18/2011 09:30:09 PM · #7 |
Votes: 5
Views: 20
Avg Vote: 5.2000 |
|
|
|
10/18/2011 09:56:16 PM · #8 |
| I"m starting to get really worn out on the voters and those that have to have the "status quo" in order to give a good score. I'm personally getting bored with the same-o, same-o stuff in all of the challenges, thus try to do something different and as usual it gets slammed for not being "slick" and usual. |
|
|
|
10/18/2011 10:14:17 PM · #9 |
AAARRRGGGHHHH!! I missed the deadline due to "life" things! (been done for a few days too!) I might not have totally flopped this time, which I've been doing often...
What do you guys think?
Oh, he's a "leftover" for halloween...
Message edited by Neil - Please post thumbails only; also the forum rules prohibit posting outtakes until after the challenge. |
|
|
|
10/18/2011 10:15:13 PM · #10 |
Originally posted by bergiekat:
I"m starting to get really worn out on the voters and those that have to have the "status quo" in order to give a good score. I'm personally getting bored with the same-o, same-o stuff in all of the challenges, thus try to do something different and as usual it gets slammed for not being "slick" and usual. |
Hear! Hear! I agree with you! |
|
|
|
10/18/2011 10:15:13 PM · #11 |
..
Message edited by author 2011-10-19 02:16:36. |
|
|
|
10/18/2011 11:06:17 PM · #12 |
Originally posted by bergiekat:
I"m starting to get really worn out on the voters and those that have to have the "status quo" in order to give a good score. I'm personally getting bored with the same-o, same-o stuff in all of the challenges, thus try to do something different and as usual it gets slammed for not being "slick" and usual. |
It's not about what score you get here really is it, it's about you being proud of your image and improving etc or just trying new stuff, reading through the comments on the coin slot a lot of the high scores that I didn't expect had comments specifically naming the photographer which must help your score by ppl either knowing your style etc or your image. I spend about 4 mins max pp which means I never get the look needed to do really well but consistently improved (well few dips hehe) so I'm enjoying the experience |
|
|
|
10/19/2011 12:07:25 AM · #13 |
And you're correct. I have grown photographically, I do enter what I like, which is rarely what the voters like, lol. It just seems that there such a huge bias toward "eye candy" and not necessarily good photography. There are days when I think this place needs to be renamed: "Slick, Stock, Seen-it-a Million-Times, Snapshot Site! Had I not committed to the WPL, there is no way I would have been entering some of these challenges and I will refrain from getting on yet another soapbox with regards to the challenge topics of late! I need a holiday! :P
On that happy note, I'm off to bed. You kids will have to hold down the fort. Sweet dreams! |
|
|
|
10/19/2011 12:41:39 AM · #14 |
| Re current challenge just gone from 6.20 to 5.6 ouch in 2 votes the pain lol |
|
|
|
10/19/2011 01:45:56 AM · #15 |
Originally posted by Giles_uk:
Re current challenge just gone from 6.20 to 5.6 ouch in 2 votes the pain lol |
oouch!! this is real painful. mine is steadily up
from 2 to 3.5:)
Message edited by author 2011-10-19 22:47:44. |
|
|
|
10/19/2011 03:18:47 AM · #16 |
Quite a few images that don't feature a baby or a toddler but show kids clearly over 3. Tut tut.
My first submission in a while isn't doing very well, alas. :-(
|
|
|
|
10/19/2011 03:53:06 AM · #17 |
Originally posted by LadyTara:
Quite a few images that don't feature a baby or a toddler but show kids clearly over 3. Tut tut.
My first submission in a while isn't doing very well, alas. :-( |
Really? Haven't looked at entries but that is a tough call to make purely on image. whoops...hope people do have the insight to not deduct points because the toddler "looks" over 3. Thinking about my own entry I'm wondering what goes on in the mind of voters should they try and determine age... Lol |
|
|
|
10/19/2011 03:59:07 AM · #18 |
LMAO Same old DPC I see. I love it.
I'm going up and down the 5 scale BTW |
|
|
|
10/19/2011 04:12:52 AM · #19 |
| Wow, I went from a 6.2 when I woke up to a 5.8, in 5 votes. |
|
|
|
10/19/2011 04:15:07 AM · #20 |
Was up at 6.0 last time I checked a couple of hours ago... but now...
Votes: 25
Views: 58
Avg Vote: 5.7600
Comments: 0 |
|
|
|
10/19/2011 05:04:46 AM · #21 |
I Would have voted 10..... Love it :o)
Originally posted by Calamazig:
AAARRRGGGHHHH!! I missed the deadline due to "life" things! (been done for a few days too!) I might not have totally flopped this time, which I've been doing often...
What do you guys think?
Oh, he's a "leftover" for halloween... |
Message edited by Neil - outtake/large image quoted. |
|
|
|
10/19/2011 05:16:50 AM · #22 |
As english is not my first language I wasn´t sure about the baby/toddler age so I "googled" it and can´t see that there is a clear line of 3 years on a toddler..... 3-4 years and even 5 years somewhere!
f.ex.
//denadio-babycare.blogspot.com/2011/07/stages-of-development-toddlers-ages-4-5.html
Originally posted by LadyTara:
Quite a few images that don't feature a baby or a toddler but show kids clearly over 3. Tut tut.
My first submission in a while isn't doing very well, alas. :-( |
|
|
|
|
10/19/2011 05:52:46 AM · #23 |
BTW, is anyone getting any comments with these skummy votes or are the [WPL participants I"m kidding!!] voters just cruising through low voting for kicks? Two super low challenges...not 1 comment as to why hovering barely above 4! Yes, ladies and gentlemen, that is a 4.0 in the previous sentence! |
|
|
|
10/19/2011 06:10:56 AM · #24 |
Originally posted by bergiekat:
BTW, is anyone getting any comments with these skummy votes or are the [WPL participants I"m kidding!!] voters just cruising through low voting for kicks? Two super low challenges...not 1 comment as to why hovering barely above 4! Yes, ladies and gentlemen, that is a 4.0 in the previous sentence! |
It wasn't me!
You have rated 87 of 87 images (100%) in this challenge.
You have given an average score of 6.5862.
I'll get to comments over the weekend. |
|
|
|
10/19/2011 06:11:08 AM · #25 |
Originally posted by LadyTara:
Quite a few images that don't feature a baby or a toddler but show kids clearly over 3. Tut tut.
My first submission in a while isn't doing very well, alas. :-( |
I had a look through the entries and I don't see any that look older than 3. I teach 3 year olds and I have a neighborhood full of 3 year olds so I have seen my fair share. But everyone's definition of toddler is going to be different so I'm sure those who are borderline are going to get a few low votes. I also googled the definition just to get an idea before voting and most places agree that a toddler is ages 1-3. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/06/2025 07:31:34 AM EDT.
