Author | Thread |
|
03/11/2011 04:06:19 PM · #101 |
|
|
03/11/2011 04:39:59 PM · #102 |
|
|
03/11/2011 06:31:57 PM · #103 |
|
|
03/11/2011 07:00:04 PM · #104 |
Bit of a break from Venice :) |
|
|
03/11/2011 07:12:12 PM · #105 |
Originally posted by salmiakki:
Bit of a break from Venice :) |
And winter :) |
|
|
03/11/2011 08:04:16 PM · #106 |
|
|
03/11/2011 08:44:47 PM · #107 |
|
|
03/12/2011 01:30:45 AM · #108 |

Message edited by author 2011-03-12 06:42:07. |
|
|
03/12/2011 02:49:35 AM · #109 |
|
|
03/12/2011 03:02:31 AM · #110 |
|
|
03/12/2011 03:14:05 AM · #111 |
Two from the Lakeview Cemetery, Cleveland, Ohio
I may be losing my concept of photo impressionism...I think expressionism defines these better. ? input? I'm confused.
Message edited by author 2011-03-12 08:19:16. |
|
|
03/12/2011 03:27:40 AM · #112 |
Originally posted by Marjo:
I may be losing my concept of photo impressionism...I think expressionism defines these better. ? input? I'm confused. |
Don't worry about it. Art's not about labels. Just do your thing.
R. |
|
|
03/12/2011 03:34:46 AM · #113 |
|
|
03/12/2011 03:55:03 AM · #114 |
|
|
03/12/2011 05:37:16 AM · #115 |
Originally posted by Marjo: I may be losing my concept of photo impressionism...I think expressionism defines these better. ? input? I'm confused. |
Nobody really knows exactly what photo impressionism is so anything goes. So far we have had examples of abstracts, surrealism, expressionism, cubism, nature photo impressionism, moody B&W (I made up quite a few of my own terms :) Your photos fit very well with this SC. |
|
|
03/12/2011 05:46:01 AM · #116 |
Originally posted by Bear_Music: Originally posted by Marjo:
I may be losing my concept of photo impressionism...I think expressionism defines these better. ? input? I'm confused. |
Don't worry about it. Art's not about labels. Just do your thing.
R. |
+1
One thing I learned from art history is that the people were not thinking of categories or definitions when they were doing it. They were just doing it. The categories were created by art critics. In fact, reading up on the impressionist painters I discovered that they rejected the notion that they were working under a label like 'impressionism.' So, in a way, it's a useful exercise to try to create something that will fit under a label but not a good long-term option. So yes I agree with Robert. |
|
|
03/12/2011 09:20:05 AM · #117 |
|
|
03/12/2011 09:31:03 AM · #118 |
Not a fresh image, but you good folks are a willing audience! Hoping to get out today.
|
|
|
03/12/2011 10:05:06 AM · #119 |
Originally posted by bspurgeon: Not a fresh image, but you good folks are a willing audience! Hoping to get out today.
|
I posted it as a comment but I will ask this here too:
How is it done? In camera or PP? |
|
|
03/12/2011 10:14:43 AM · #120 |
Originally posted by marnet: I posted it as a comment but I will ask this here too:
How is it done? In camera or PP? |
Ben's very much an in-camera guy, plus this was an actual entry in a FS, so I am sure the effect is almost entirely natural, not PP. Notice the lens he used; he's going to town with that lens, it produces an unearthly smooth and palpable OOF bokeh.
R. |
|
|
03/12/2011 10:23:24 AM · #121 |
Originally posted by Bear_Music: Originally posted by marnet: I posted it as a comment but I will ask this here too:
How is it done? In camera or PP? |
Ben's very much an in-camera guy, plus this was an actual entry in a FS, so I am sure the effect is almost entirely natural, not PP. Notice the lens he used; he's going to town with that lens, it produces an unearthly smooth and palpable OOF bokeh.
R. |
So it is a wide angle lens and he takes photos out-of-focus - more learning to do! Thanks |
|
|
03/12/2011 10:38:58 AM · #122 |
So the surfer image is mostly in camera with the exception of BW processing. The key here was using the shadow side of the pier. The surfer agreed to stand as still as possible, but relaxed. I used a 10 stop ND filter for the 2-3 minute exposure. This is actually a crop, a portion of the pier is in the original and is razor sharp. The blur is motion, not a defocused blur.
ND filters allow for some magical images. The first image I posted below was all in camera due to the 10 stop filter.
Bear is right, this lens has splendid bokeh, best appreciated wide open (see my recent Shoe and FS entries). |
|
|
03/12/2011 10:48:05 AM · #123 |
I am desperately ready for Spring. |
|
|
03/12/2011 11:40:44 AM · #124 |
Originally posted by bspurgeon: So the surfer image is mostly in camera with the exception of BW processing. The key here was using the shadow side of the pier. The surfer agreed to stand as still as possible, but relaxed. I used a 10 stop ND filter for the 2-3 minute exposure. This is actually a crop, a portion of the pier is in the original and is razor sharp. The blur is motion, not a defocused blur.
ND filters allow for some magical images. The first image I posted below was all in camera due to the 10 stop filter.
Bear is right, this lens has splendid bokeh, best appreciated wide open (see my recent Shoe and FS entries). |
So he wasn't quite still so he blurred. In the FS walkers on the beach - did they pose for you and then ran off when the wave came before the end of exposure?
Message edited by author 2011-03-12 16:42:35. |
|
|
03/12/2011 11:51:55 AM · #125 |
Originally posted by marnet: Originally posted by bspurgeon:
Bear is right, this lens has splendid bokeh, best appreciated wide open (see my recent Shoe and FS entries). |
So he wasn't quite still so he blurred. In the FS walkers on the beach - did they pose for you and then ran off when the wave came before the end of exposure? |
Yes, surfer was blurred by the waves, etc.
FS, self portrait. Again, 10 stop filter, f/2.8, I believe it was a 10 second exposure. The foot prints were erased every other set, so I made a foot print...ran back to the camera focused on the print. Waited for a new set to "erase" the sand. Then, using the cameras timer, walked in to the frame at a quick pace, then paused for 5 seconds to get my feet in the frame, then walked slowly away. A bit cheesy, but I liked it. My toddler is on my shoulders, she is the shadow over the water where I'm paused. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/08/2025 06:31:34 PM EDT.