|
Image |
Comment |
| 01/19/2005 01:28:50 PM | American Psychoby rmtm333Comment: My (not worth much) thoughts on this image.
Firstly, I gave it a 5. In a brief look, it's far from tripe, but it has areas of definite improvement.
(segue)
Let me explain! : ) Now keep in mind I don't hold any of the crudentials of a worthy comment (ie, ribbons). That being said, let's get started. Firstly, the picture is too dark. I understand that was the effect you were going for, and it can be done very effectively; however it just seems to me that the darkness loses so much that could be there, and if it were would contribute to the image. Also, I wouldn't have gone with Black and White for this. When you've got that much black space beckoning for your attention, you need something to command it, and a dimly lit black and white shadowed face won't do it for me, at least. Which (sort of) segues into my next point of commency. The cropping on this photograph. I'm not sure why you'd crop it like this because there really isn't anything that this crop does, besides make the shot feel unbalanced and draw the attention further away from the face (which I assume is the intended subject :D) So anyways... right, the crop. While you've more or less balanced the negative space with the subject, which is good, the placement of the face, in my opinion, doesn't work. I would've personally liked to have seen some negative space to the left of the face (which subsequentially means showing the entire face). Having it fill the frame vertically is ok, I guess. I mean, I can't think of, off the top of my head, a way to improve it, but it just doesn't do much for me, y'know? Anyways, I'll move on to my next point of critiquois, the blur. I understand what you were trying to go for. Unfortunately, you didn't pull it off. Blur can be an effective tool, if in juxtaposition with sharpness. Also, to go for something like you were trying to do, you'd need not only a firm sharpness, but also more detail, so you'd be able to distinctly identify the object. The darkness has lost a lot of your detail, making the blur slightly ineffective. If you wanted the "action" on the knife, I would've gone for more sharpness in the face, and a steadier movement to get a more solid figure of the knife. Currently, the only thing identifying the knife is the seraded teeth, which are blown and unsteady from the lighting placement, I assume. Come to think of it, it'd be pretty tough to pull off the action in a way that would please the voters. Off the top of my head I can think of 1 shot where blur went well with the voters, and it involved a naked Imagineer. And that almost segues into the next topic, the lighting. I'll be frank, I don't like it. At least, I don't like the shadows. I don't like it because A) the picture is too dark and B) the shadows, though possibly intended for effect, do nothing but detract elements that could improve the image. The eyebrow extensions I don't like, the nose I don't like, and the upper lip and chin I don't like. As dimly lit and lacking detail as this shot is, you can't afford to lose any more detail by "artistic" shadows for effect. That's my only real gripe.
In closing, I hope I've been affective in understanding why 47 people gave you a low score. I guess a good closing comment would be "If you're going to break the rules, do it well" or "A tip for scoring higher is don't be creative, unless being creative conforms with the voters' opinions." but I won't end with one of those. Instead I'll end with the following:
"Where's my duck?" | Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/16/2005 01:03:32 PM | |
| 01/12/2005 04:55:36 PM | | Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/12/2005 04:51:38 PM | | Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/12/2005 04:40:30 PM | | Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/12/2005 04:37:08 PM | Splash!by panoramixComment: Man, do I know how you feel. You're obviously somewhere around Ohio, judging by the liscense plate. It's been so wet here, it's unbelievable. I live right along the Scioto River, and some houses off of the river are flooded, it's a big mess. Hopefully it'll dry out soon. We hit 60 degrees today though! | Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/12/2005 01:03:58 AM | | Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/05/2005 02:37:19 PM | Evening Strollby ZoomdakComment: Why does this look suspiciously like the Oregon coast, at Cannon Beach? : ) | Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/05/2005 02:34:30 PM | | Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/05/2005 10:12:39 AM | the first time can be magic.by mrsamsaComment: Nice bokeh (I love using that word : D) A few things I would've like to seen differently though: I would've like to see the full outline of the girl, more of a head on approach to it. The look on her face and the rosy cheeks are outstanding, good work. There seems to be an awkward glow around all the people. Also, I'd like to see a little more room between the parent and the edge of the frame, though it depends on how you took the picture, and it isn't really obvious what they're doing! Maybe including the ice skates in the frame so its clear what you're talking about in your title. All in all thoug, an above average image. Undoubtedly candid, and a marvelous expression. | Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/18/2025 01:16:13 PM EDT.
|