" ... untitled ..."
by Moose101

Comment:
Folks, I'm the fellow who wrote the previous message with all those links. I did note what I felt were strong similarities, but I have it on very good authority that this is truly one of those coincidences that just happens when you have some millions of digital cameras sold to millions of photographers through out the world.
Just like people, it's very rare to find what appears to be an identical twin who is not related through blood, but on occasion it just happens.
I was originally shocked at the striking similarities between my own photo and this one, but on discovering this Moose was also flattened by the chilling likeness.
I truly believe that he is a good person, with a good heart, and had not had prior knowledge of my image, thereby thinking and going through great lengths to turn this visualization into a truly original work of his own art.
Moose, I commend you on your brilliance and creative work, and the trouble your went through to bring it all together. A job well done, and a ribbon well deserved.
Please accept my apology for posting before making the effort to speak to you first. You have been polite and forth coming, and I feel terrible to have caused you any ageist as a result of my swiftness of text and slowness of thought.
Brian D. Watters

" ... untitled ..."
by Moose101

Comment:
Great minds think alike. :) Congratulations on your version, you even have the same strand of wire behind your arm as on my original from a year ago, now that's an eerie coincidence.
Brian D. Watters

//www.digitalimagecafe.com/potq_images.asp

//www.digitalphotocontest.com/profile.asp?pid=17252

//www.bestfoto.com/Archives/POTDdisplay.asp?PIC=100604B%2Ejpg

//www.shutterbugs.biz/cgi-bin/select_potm.pl

//www.photoblink.com/imageview.asp?imageid=132223

//www.fotofight.com/contest/photo.php?&p=933906

Bird in garden
by Dvan

Comment:
The Focus is good, and colours vibrant, however the reeds in front of your "Bird" face is very distracting.

Anna K
by la maga

Comment:
Though ascetically sound, this image in my opinion, does not fit into the category of conflict. The subjects look weary or tired, not in conflict

Apple vs. Personal Computer: Battle of digital imagers and main stream computer users
by sps_1

Comment:
Though ascetically sound, this image in my opinion, does not fit into the category of conflict. The title suggests conflict, though non is obvious in the image. The title cannot by itself be the qualifier for the category.

now what do i do?
by whiteroom

Comment:
Though ascetically sound, this image in my opinion, does not fit into the category of conflict. The title suggests conflict, but the image displayed shows a someone happy at catching a fish.

an eat more greens conflict
by Pooba

Comment:
Though ascetically sound, this image in my opinion, does not fit into the category of conflict. The title alone cannot be the qualifier, it suggests conflict with a subject not present in the image.

I know I shouldn't, BUT...
by Russell2566

Comment:
Though ascetically sound, this image in my opinion, does not fit into the category of conflict. The only conflict here is in the mind of the writer of the title, not in the image. If a person were visible for instance in the mirror wit a troubled look on their face or some other scenario, it might just work.

Which is better...
by xcharrier

Comment:
Though ascetically sound, this image in my opinion, does not fit into the category of conflict.

WWJD? WWYD...
by jjbates4

Comment:
Though ascetically sound, this image in my opinion, does not fit into the category of conflict.