The Old Barn and I
by nards656

Comment:
to be honest, i was shocked when I scrolled down and saw the score - definitely underrated in my book. Its a good, understated self-portrait, strong atmosphere lent by the old barn, and challenge link right on spot. The darkness leading in to the brighter centre works well, but when you look at it more its clear it is underexposed at the far outside, and overexposed. As this was Advanced Editing, I would have thought you could rescue some of it, although the best approach would have been to combine 2 exposures (so obviously out-of-challenge), keeping the dark a nd lihght, but saving the extremes.

Having now read through the other comments, I disagree with the challenge-meeting part - this portrait is nothing without the context of the barn, it does exactly what the title says it will. Guess everyone else has their own opinions of course

OUCH! Sharp
by tngrndream

Comment:
well, its emotive - really made me wince. First, the lighting seems a little flat on the hand, making it a bit bland and flat which does give it an amateurish feel (though of course we ARE amateurs). However, the dof works really well with the OOF knife and stain giving context.

One simple thing which would have made it a lot neater is to have ensured that the white tissue in the background was consistent, without the stripe at the top. I think you could also have made it more dynamic a composition by experimenting with different positions of the main elements - atm all the action seems to be squished into the middle section.

As others have mentioned, the challenge link wasn't clear enough for some people. Although I'm never a fan of long titles to weasel inappropriate photos into challenges, you could have chosen a title to strengthen the (already existent) challenge link here, for example "fresh blood".

A New Castle Awaits the Coming Tide
by chalice

Comment:
The positioning of the subject works well imho, with the diagonal of the sea making it more than just empty sand. Although I would personally give a tiny bit more negative space to the left, so its more bang on the third.

The noise doesn't detract overall, but it seems as though it makes the girl less crisp and clear - 400ISO seems a tad unnecessary if you're working with this light level.

Its nice how the brightly coloured subject pops out, but I think it could be made a lot stronger with just a little extra to echo this colour - maybe a bucket in the sand in front of the castle, or something, perhaps.

At first I thought this would have scored higher - maybe around 5.8 at least, but the link to the challenge isn't particularly dynamic whic hdoes bring it down aa little in my books. Its not that it dnmc or anything, but the link isn't 'wow'.

edit: just been looking through the other comments - I like ericwoo's approach with the sepia. Although the burst of colour is lost, it brings out more texture in the sand. Not sure which version I prefer

Message edited by author 2006-04-30 16:08:50.

Promise of a new day
by Gert

Comment:
awwww bless! Sure got significance for you then - hoping it was a yes of course

Anatomy of a strike
by Melethia

Comment:
I love the originality of the idea, but the title perfects it. Nice composition, and exposure seems spot on.
Not too keen on the border, but 'tis not a big deal.

Candid_outtake2
by DigiFotoBuddy

Comment:
The backlighting's really nice on this one, as well as the converging diagonal formed by the path and height differences of the people. I'm not sure how it would have compared with your entry.

Storytime friends
by MattO

Comment:
woah, i was surprised at the low score this got, its a nice composition and really cute. The toys do blend in with the b/g , like a1275 pointed out, but also it seems as though the focus on the child aint perfect. But overall I'm sure its underrated

Spring colors
by MattO

Comment:
I think the very shallow dof would work more effectively with a tighter crop, because as it is, the entire right half is oof, and the sharpest part, on the stamens, is bang on centre. Its difficult with daffodils, 'cause they can get kinda boring close up, just lots of yellow but maybe you could give it something else by harsher lighting, to bring out the textures

Message edited by author 2006-04-20 12:31:04.

IMG_9897-copy-2.jpg
by Mr_Pants

Comment:
I love this, but the zoom blur effect (assuming is was a filter rather than done manually) is slightly weird, with more distinct 'lines' of blur than I'd expect.

Mother and Child
by Mr_Pants

Comment:
I love how the texture is very repetitive and simple, so the shallow dof gives a very smooth gradient as it goes oof. The vertical lines work well juxtaposed with the smooth curves of the sculpture. Sensitively lit, though I might like to see it with slightly less strong lighter, so the right-hand side is slightly darker.