Why?
by DaveSM

Comment by JJWoolls:
I think the color is lacking. the light is too light and the shadow is too dark.

I am not a good photographer, I do not claim to be better than anyone, any criticism is meant to be constructive criticism......

Why?
by DaveSM

Comment by Tez:
Why what? Why is her head stuck to her knee?

NO More Nails! Sticks Anything To Anything! Fact!

I like your picture but I wish it were a little sharper on the face and the lighting boosted a little and a bit more saturation in the skin.

True science ain't pretty
by DaveSM

Comment by dudeman13:
yes it is

True science ain't pretty
by DaveSM

Comment by whiterook:
too much stuff

True science ain't pretty
by DaveSM

Comment by lynnmarie:
(Not necessarily!) Not sure what I'm looking at, so it is hard for me to assess the science "connection". Lighting is good.

True science ain't pretty
by DaveSM

Comment by nlghttrain:
to me this shot is uninteresting. the lighting is flat and the subject isnt drawing me it. There is too much going on in the background

Windcatcher
by DaveSM

Comment by DavidLopez:
Nice postcard...

Old but reliabe way of transportation
by DaveSM

Comment by Judi:
Greetings from the Critique Club.

Composition: The composition is your major let down here. You have cropped harshly over the tyre and left a vacant area on the right of the image making the bike point out of the image instead of the preferred into the image.

Technical: Focus and tones are good and the selective desaturation is selective but on topic.

Overall:Try a lower angle and maybe from a different point of view for more points.

True science ain't pretty
by DaveSM

Comment by DavidLopez:
Very nice...

Windcatcher
by DaveSM

Comment by littlefish:
ok