untitled
by johnny_justjohnny

Comment by Swashbuckler:
I am certain you included the "blur" for a reason. I wear glasses, and I don't "see" the point to it, except to make the photo harder to see. 5 Swash

untitled
by johnny_justjohnny

Comment by hypoStiller:
Cute idea ... blurry "before" picture of the ophthalmologist. A child would certainly see it from the low angle, too. I do want a bit more color -- something else to capture the eye (no pun intended).

untitled
by johnny_justjohnny

Comment by LanSnake:
Very creative idea -- hope people don't beat you up too bad because of the blur/focus. Excellent work and will initially vote you high and take another look later in the week. Ok....reviewing all of my voting for the week and I still like your photo very much. I guess I can relate as I was almost blind until I got my glasses around the age of 11! One of my favorites for the week -- 10. LanSnake

untitled
by johnny_justjohnny

Comment by justine:
Cute idea, done well. Score 7 Kee

untitled
by johnny_justjohnny

Comment by Journey:
What my eye sees above all are those white squiggly things and I have no idea what they are or what they are meant to convey. I like the low angle of this image to transport the viewer into the world of thesmall child. Also suppose the image is so blurred to convey the feelings of confusion and anxiety of the child going to the doctor. Yet, the blurriness is overdone for my taste. Prelim: 6 Journey

untitled
by johnny_justjohnny

Comment by byetko:
My favorite kind of photography is light streaks but this really doesn't work for me. 5.

untitled
by johnny_justjohnny

Comment by cmcvety:
good idea.

untitled
by johnny_justjohnny

Comment by GlasMenagerie:
Came THIS close to commenting on the lack of focus. Good job!