christafari
by johnny_justjohnny

Comment by gcibo:
great reflection

christafari
by johnny_justjohnny

Comment by Washington Webfoot:
I think I would like to see it cropped off with just the table but that is my personal observation.

christafari
by johnny_justjohnny

Comment by Ruben:
Your picture is good. I do not understand the title.

christafari
by johnny_justjohnny

Comment by louis1470:
Would have been great that the cut-off point of the reflection be the same as the cut-off point on the top edge of the picture. Does this make sense?

christafari
by johnny_justjohnny

Comment by CPattee:
very original, well done

christafari
by johnny_justjohnny

Comment by Kavey:
I like the way that the head is cropped off the actual image and seen only as a reflection. The background is cluttered and I'd prefer it without someone else in shot.
Creative/ interesting idea.
Kavey

christafari
by johnny_justjohnny

Comment by LindaLee:
I think I would have been happier with just the reflection, leaving out what you can see above the table. Does he have dreads??? Don't know why, but I don't get those. lhall-7

christafari
by johnny_justjohnny

Comment by digitallywet:
cool

christafari
by johnny_justjohnny

Comment by jmsetzler:
Meets the Challenge: Yes
Artistic Merit (Would I print/frame/hang it?): 3
Creativity (Did a lot of thought go into this photo?): 7
Technical (Focus/DOF/Lighting/Etc): 5
Composition (Subject well-positioned and framed): 6
WOW Factor (Is the photo interesting?): 6

Score: 5 - setzler

christafari
by johnny_justjohnny

Comment by jsabbarton:
Interesting idea, but I don't think it works too well composition wise. Yes, it's a reflection; but I don't think there's enough of it. The water, which I assume is the prime subject, is – in my opinion – lost to all the distractions around the table that draw the eye away from the central subject. The lighting is a little dull and he focus is slightly soft. I think that cropping the image to only show the blue of the table, the bottom half of the picture, would have worked much better. Sorry to be so negativeâ€Â¦ (2)