No Time & Fast Changing Technology
by spiller

Comment by sjgleah:
Don't understand your title or your intention. 3 sjgleah

No Time & Fast Changing Technology
by spiller

Comment by Denise Catania:
cool abstract

No Time & Fast Changing Technology
by spiller

Comment by Swashbuckler:
Title? I think it resembles your photo, a bit jumbled. I would call this a little bit of a reach for this challenge. The photo is well taken. The focus is pretty good (the watch face seems "off" just a bit. Framing is too much of a personal choice to me, I prefer to not cut off subjects, but this is acceptable. I like the reflection of the watch in the CD. I'm not crazy about the carpet, but you make due with what you have on hand. As a just plain photo, it's about a 7, as a challenge photo, about the best I can go is 5. Swash

No Time & Fast Changing Technology
by spiller

Comment by jsabbarton:
Hmmm – great picture, well lit and fits the challenge. I would say it's a bit too clinical, but then, so is capitalismâ€Â¦ (8)

No Time & Fast Changing Technology
by spiller

Comment by floyd:
A bit too literal for my tastes. Also the focus seems a bit off. The lighting is ok but not very dramatic. Those CDs could be giving us more colour.

No Time & Fast Changing Technology
by spiller

Comment by Digipixer:
The only thing detracting from this pix is the out of focus watch face.

No Time & Fast Changing Technology
by spiller

Comment by camelotnorth:
good design and use of colors

No Time & Fast Changing Technology
by spiller

Comment by sheyingshi88:
Nice product shot.

No Time & Fast Changing Technology
by spiller

Comment by karmat:
I like the colors in this, and the idea is good. I think, however, you almost have two separate pictures going on. I would have preferred it without the watch. karmat

No Time & Fast Changing Technology
by spiller

Comment by Konador:
7:-
It is a well set up photograph that shows the topic matter in a fairly good way. I think however that the photo it a bit blurred, where the camera has been moved or something, and it has tried to be sharpened in photoshop, although that adds a horrible grain to the photo.